Zeiss Ikon Super Ikonta C (530/2) Compur Rapid/Tessar f4.5, "demo"

buze

Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
179
Location
Windsor, UK
Format
Multi Format
I certainly don't shoot this 1934 camera for the sharpness. It's a great camera, but well, 1934 Tessar, uncoated.... sharpness ? huhu..

huhu ?

Think again...

I just got a slap in the face this afternoon when scanning a TMax 100.

First is the image, resized from 8080 x 5165 (or "40 megapixels") next are the "crop" of the original...

Crops
 

DougGrosjean

Member
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
341
Format
Medium Format
Yup.

I'm not surprised. I've got one, too, though mine is 1950's era so prolly has coated lenses and such.

But still - when I get focus and exposure right, it does very well.

Not so good for closeups - then an old TLR is better. But for anything else, it's great.
 

vet173

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2005
Messages
1,209
Location
Seattle
Format
8x10 Format
Hey, hey, hey, Let's not let that cat out of the bag. Now that you know I guess you have to find someone local to show you the secret handshake.
 

Nancy

Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2003
Messages
142
Location
Kansas
Format
35mm
You can't beat that for sharpness.
I have a Novar on my 6x9 and while not as sharp as yours, it's still pretty amazing.
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,244
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
Jadedoto said:
I love my 1929 Ikon 555!

I seem to find the uncoated tessar a bit too contrasy on mine, however.
Click to expand...
That's a new one - most people seem to believe that old uncoated lenses are weak on contrast. Maybe you should develop the films a bit less?

I'm not at all surprised by the sharpness, though. I use Tessar (and Tessar-type lenses) on all formats from 35mm to 30x40cm, focal lengths from 50mm to 500mm, ages spanning a full century. They are ALL bitingly sharp!
 

Stephanie Brim

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,603
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
I dunno...If I had the money I'd buy the camera to check it out, but I don't.
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,244
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
buze said:
Tessars were designed for f4.5 really; f3.5 was already stretching it a bit and I find that f2.8 makes it more or less useless at that aperture...
Click to expand...

That depends a bit on the focal length. The 5cm/2,8 on my Welti is great, even wide open. So is the 7,5cm/3,5 on my Zeiss Ikon. And the various 135, 150, 180, 210 and 300mm f:4.5 lenses, and the 50cm/6,3 one. Shorter focal lengths can have larger max aperture without undue loss of definition.
 

Jim Jones

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
3,740
Location
Chillicothe MO
Format
Multi Format
buze said:
Tessars were designed for f4.5 really; f3.5 was already stretching it a bit and I find that f2.8 makes it more or less useless at that aperture...
Click to expand...
This may be true in larger formats. However, two of the sharpest lenses for 35mm I ever checked were a Leitz Elmar 50mm f/2.8 and the GN-Nikkor 45mm f/2.8.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…