• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

For Sale YouTube Interview: "Making KODAK Film" by Shanebrook

Trader history for laser (8)


What’s really the difference between Technical Pan and Plus-X emulsions? When I read the technical documents the only difference I see is that Plus-X had a “retouching surface” and Technical Pan did not.
 
What’s really the difference between Technical Pan and Plus-X emulsions? When I read the technical documents the only difference I see is that Plus-X had a “retouching surface” and Technical Pan did not.
As far as I know Technical Pan is a microfilm/lith film that can also with a special developer be stretched to be a pictorial film.
 
What’s really the difference between Technical Pan and Plus-X emulsions?

Fairly massive.

One is a medium speed, normally sensitised, normal contrast, 3D grain, very conventional film (Plus-X), the other is a specialist highly monodisperse, very high resolving material which can (in a specialist low contrast developer & at a low EI) deliver 'normal' contrast, but in normal & then higher contrast developers deliver an array of increasingly steep contrast ranges (for various technical purposes etc).
 
One cool thing about Tech Pan was that it reached to almost 700nm. Which made use of red filter possible without going into very long shutter speeds.
I find however that ADOX combo of HR-50 and CMS20 II covers the ground that Tech Pan did better.

Pan X would make more sense to bring back IMO. It would be practical and have a market niche.
But even that has modern equivalents and part supplements that make it doubtful how well it would sell.
I'd buy though.
 
Last edited:
Psst - consider starting a new thread - Bob is using this thread to sell his very excellent book!