I don't know that I would consider Prince a photographer, even though he uses photography--but it is someone else's!Over rated by auction houses, collectors and speculators: Richard Prince.
Most under rated by collectors, my work, of course.
There was only one rule!Most under rated by collectors, my work, of course.
Under or overrated?Peter Lik
How underrated could he be if Steidl has published a monograph?Check out the Steidl monograph on Levinstein, one of my favorite photo books.
If you look through Steidl's catalog, I think you'll find a good many relatively unknown photographers represented. I wouldn't necessarily use a single monograph by Steidl as a barometer. Steidl published a Louis Faurer monograph as well, but I would also file him in the underrated category. Put another way, when people discuss the greats of street photography (as an example), I think few would mention Levinstein or Faurer.How underrated could he be if Steidl has published a monograph?
Of course it is. So is "which is the best Leica film camera?" or "which is the most rugged Nikon F?", but that doesn't stop us from discussing those topics. Just nice to discuss something other than hardware for a change. Or not...Is all about taste, like pretty much everything else.
Why? There are no fireworks yet.Yeah.
This thread is a bad idea.
I guess a definition of "rated" is in order. Rated by whom? Critics? Museums? Collectors? Or just the folks you happen to hang with or are on this forum? It's a tricky definition. Being relatively unknown does not mean a photographer isn't held in regard by those who are doing this rating.If you look through Steidl's catalog, I think you'll find a good many relatively unknown photographers represented. I wouldn't necessarily use a single monograph by Steidl as a barometer. Steidl published a Louis Faurer monograph as well, but I would also file him in the underrated category. Put another way, when people discuss the greats of street photography (as an example), I think few would mention Levinstein or Faurer.
Well, lets hope there are not any.Why? There are no fireworks yet.
I honestly don't think this is that complicated. The question is, who in your opinion is underrated and overrated? Who do you think deserves more attention and who do you think gets more attention than they deserve? Use whatever metrics you deem important - gallery representation, number ofi museums who hold the artists work in their permanent collection,, selling prices of prints at auction, number of solo/group shows, number of YouTube videos about them, number of books about them, etc..I guess a definition of "rated" is in order. Rated by whom? Critics? Museums? Collectors? Or just the folks you happen to hang with or are on this forum? It's a tricky definition. Being relatively unknown does not mean a photographer isn't held in regard by those who are doing this rating.
I thought we could have a reasonable discourse on this subject. If this thread is deemed a bad idea then I apologize for starting it and won't take offense if the moderators decide to close it.Well, lets hope there are not any.
JMHO, of course.
Ultimately, it is the owners of this forum that decide what is "Allowed".
Just relating my experience.....no matter if it is race car drivers, guitar players, photographers, actors, etc etc etc.
It does not make the members of the forum look good to be crapping on others of the same skill.
Most forums i belong to usually "Discourage" these types of threads.
It is much better to just discuss the crafts person that you like, and not who you think sucks.
And discussing who is "Overrated" is just another way of saying that person XYZ sucks and does not deserve the Money, Notoriety, Success that they have.achieved.
I really dig Lee Miller right now.
I doubt very much any of the photographers mentioned participate in this forum.It does not make the members of the forum look good to be crapping on others of the same skill.
At least under their own namesI doubt very much any of the photographers mentioned participate in this forum.
I thought they were synonyms.If you replace under-rated with under-appreciated, it is all good.
Good suggestion, let's go with that.And if you replace over-rated with over-exposed, it is probably worth discussing.
If you replace under-rated with under-appreciated, it is all good.
In some ways they are synonyms.I thought they were synonyms.
That is usually the way i see it presented to the membership.If you replace under-rated with under-appreciated, it is all good.
And if you replace over-rated with over-exposed, it is probably worth discussing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?