I am really happy, your opinion is very optimistic, encouraging and logical.Looks like a very acceptable color film. Hard to say more (sharpness etc.) with small scans, and I don't apparently have a very good eye for color (which can be difficult to impossible to judge on a web browser, anyway). At $6 a roll, it's cost competitive with other quality color films in 35 mm.
Last time I actually bought color negative film was 2005, and that was Fuji Superia Xtra 400; for the scenes shown, this seems similarly good.
Thank you, Mr. EricI like it. Maybe a bit sensitive to dark shadows but the image with the sheep is well recorded.
00380544971710 This is the phone number of Mr. Dimitri of UkraineI am impressed with the color. I would use this film.
Yes brother 36 frameLooks good to me, mohmad. Skin colour looks fine which is most important and the colours look neutral. That is to say not falsely saturated
Is this a 36 frame film? If it is then by today's prices $6 per roll looks to be good value
pentaxuser
I think the shot of the girl is great. She's very beautiful and if your daughter, you are a very lucky man.
thank you brotherMost of the frames seem to be for color films, but the portrait of the young girl is excellent--if its appearance is particular to this film, then I'd find it very good.. I don't see any flaws in the film.
It's a very subtle color palette, even in sunlight with the brighter colored subjects. Grain is good, and I like the way the underexposed shadows don't go to a greenish tint, as some old-time chrome films used to do. Might not be my first choice for every subject, but it's a very usable film for many. Especially at that price.
Andy
Reminds me of Kodak Portra film. It's made to reproduce skin tones. It's palette is not oversaturated and plain. I think the shot of the girl is great. She's very beautiful and if your daughter, you are a very lucky man.
Appears to be a decent film. What you might want to find out from Dmitriy is whether these pics are from normal C41 processing of aerial film or some other process.
+1 though it's not exactly clear whether the picture is from recent times or from distant past.
I am no longer interested in verifying the truth about this product, I have the same.So is it repackaged Kodak Aerocolor or Agfa Aviphot unmasked neg stock?
Nice looking film, I'd say.
This movie will be sold in Egypt. And it should be at a fair price.Yes, looks just fine, and suited for skin tones. Colors in these images are rather warm and yellowish and I'd have to make a few prints of it to see how well the color rendition is suited to other subject matter such as foliage or saturated primary colors; I suspect that is probably not the strongest point of this film. Contrast seems fairly high with moderate saturation. Overall it reminds me a lot of Kodak ProImage 100 which retails at between $5 and $9 depending on where you shop.
This movie will be sold in Egypt. And it should be at a fair price.
- Ukraine or Russia, there is no ban of any kind on them, what do you say?From what you have shown here it is perfectly acceptable. However at $6 a roll it is compared to UK prices a bit more expensive We can still get Fuji 200 and Kodak 200 at under £4. I have not considered any colour casts as these can generally be filtered to be neutral (although I could not see any). In harsh sunlight, yes the shadows are dense but that is what I would expect. Looking at the lady drinking from the bottle where the light is not so severe it is fine. Even the ones with the two (Lovely) ladies lying on their backs is perfectly acceptable with plenty of punch to the image.
From such small images I cannot say about the grain which with scans will be more prominent than darkroom prints, especially with high end dedicated film scanners. Flatbeds are more forgiving in that respect.
With the packet having Russian cyrillic characters I am assuming it comes from somewhere like Ukraine as legally you should not be able to by Russian because of the trade ban.
Please note, that box and packaging on the last photo is not from this film, it is from b/w negative and there are label in Ukrainian on it. The correct package for this color film is:
https://sreda.photo/product-images/astrum_color_negative-1.png
Only for 35 mm?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?