• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Yes! ANOTHER $%^&^ Agitation Question!

Arkasha

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
111
Format
Medium Format
Greetings,

I recently acquired a plastic developing tank. It has a plastic stirring rod and undulations so when you spin the reel back and forth it goes up and down as well. It was part of a Beseler developing kit.

I'm curious about this - I've always agitated by inversion, but the literature with the tank claims the stirrer does a great job, and it would be marginally easier for me to time the agitation cycle. However, the only information I found about this method was a complaint by one user who didn't like it.

A search here turned up nothing.

Does anyone have an opinion on this method, positive or negative?


Thanks!
 

kerne

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 26, 2010
Messages
152
Location
Tallahassee
Format
Multi Format
I'm not a fan of swizzle sticks either. Tried it once and got very uneven development. :/
 

Jerry Thirsty

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Messages
283
Format
35mm
Same bad results as kerne. Very uneven between edges and center.
 

jordanstarr

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
781
Location
Ontario
Format
Multi Format
....I can't say from experience, but the logic behind the twirling of the canister is to allow fresh developer to move all over the film. I can't imagine the stick doing the same quality of job, even if it does move up and down. The film kinda "cuts" through the developer, not really moving it around a lot. I wouldn't trust it personally, but I'm doing dip n' dunk.
 

Herzeleid

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
386
Location
Ankara/Turkey
Format
Multi Format
Using the agitation stick always overdeveloped the edges of my negatives. I invert when developing and use the stick for stop and fixer.
 
OP
OP

Arkasha

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
111
Format
Medium Format
Thanks, all. Good to have a clear answer on the issue.
 

Neal

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 3, 2004
Messages
2,030
Location
Chicago, West Suburbs
Format
Multi Format
Dear Arkasha,

Just to screw things up a bit, I have one of those tanks (they are sold under the Arista and Adorama house names now) and it works great. I probably agitate a bit more than most but I never had problems with it before I went to the Jobo system.

Neal Wydra
 
OP
OP

Arkasha

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
111
Format
Medium Format

So much for consensus!


Thanks for the info, Neal. I like the plastic tank, and found 120 easy to load with included reel. I may try out the rod agitator just to see.
 

Chris Douglas

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
87
Format
35mm
plastic tanks

I managed to get even development with a Yankee tank, but the stick wouldn't do it. Sliding the tank back and forth on the table top works, but it has to be fast enough that the developer is almost spilling out the top. I went to stainless steel and inversion, and won't go back.
 

Juri

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
65
Location
Estonia, Eur
Format
35mm RF
I have a developing tank just like that, with the rod moving up and down. I spin the rod in one direction and I haven't had any problems with uneven development. I think when you spin it right, it moves the chemicals around enough during the whole development cycle. No need to worry about spilling chemicals. Has worked for me.