• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Xpan Users

St Ives - UK

A
St Ives - UK

  • 2
  • 0
  • 53
Across the Liffey

H
Across the Liffey

  • Tel
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1
  • 2
  • 49

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,438
Messages
2,840,881
Members
101,332
Latest member
Paul William
Recent bookmarks
0
Let me be the first to bitch. I use a Linhof 612. So at 2:1 this means I'm still homeless? What autocrat came up with 2.5:1?

OK I'm vented. I still sent in this years subscription.
 
photobum said:
Let me be the first to bitch. I use a Linhof 612. So at 2:1 this means I'm still homeless? What autocrat came up with 2.5:1?

You belong to medium format. What makes you think your camera is panoramic?
 
So if I get a new lense does that mean I Xpand?
 
photobum said:
Let me be the first to bitch. I use a Linhof 612. So at 2:1 this means I'm still homeless? What autocrat came up with 2.5:1?

OK I'm vented. I still sent in this years subscription.

It must be designed to avoid people like me - who uses a 35W back on a Bronica ETRS: 24x54mm negative size = 2.25:1.

Almost made it.

But I'll get my own back by taping half a roll of 120 FP4+ in my 30x40cm camera and get a 6x40cm panorama!
 
photobum said:
Let me be the first to bitch. I use a Linhof 612. So at 2:1 this means I'm still homeless? What autocrat came up with 2.5:1?

For me aspect ratio has a lot to do with where you started. If you started with 6x6 then even 6x9 or 35mm can look panoramic to your eyes. I started at the other end doing 8:1 panoramics with Cirkut cameras. Coming from that extreme 6x17 doesn't look very panoramic to me.

When I shoot 617 I always crop a bit off the top to stretch the format a bit, I like a 4:1 minimum.

Clayton
 
Clayton, the horizon 'round here is never that flat.

Of the 100+ shots I've made with the 35W back, more than half were vertical...
 
Clay, Ole, The camera has its own feel to it. Yes as a pano it does not add up. But as a hand held street walking fast handling camera it is remarkable! Pop in film set exposure and go. The larger cameras, Sure they are great, I have a pano back for my LF (well 4x5) also but it is nice to run and gun at times and this guy makes it really easy.
 
Ole said:
Clayton, the horizon 'round here is never that flat.

Of the 100+ shots I've made with the 35W back, more than half were vertical...

Ole, it's the same here, hills everywhere and I've never done a single vertical panorama.

Clayton
 
I'm kind of wanting to fashion a panoramic pinhole camera...24mmx80mm. I'd count, right? :wink:
 
What exactly is the ratio of the xpan panoramic frame?

i think its more than 2.5:1 ..??
 
Thomassauerwein said:
Yes as a pano it does not add up.

True, until you start climbing high peaks, loading Kodachrome 25 in it, etc.
 
xpan2 + 30mm + rvp 100
62740939.QpxbDJRD.img848.jpg
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom