I guess no one followed our links!
In all honesty, I did and I also saw the uneven development that's so difficult to avoid with this film. Sorry...E.g. in the image of the silo there's a very 'hot edge' on the right, and many artifacts in the part of the sky that should have been more even. The one with the big roll has an odd artifact bottom left and the shadow areas show how the insufficient density was subject to salvage attempts in digital post processing, resulting in a coarse and uneven transition form the black point into differentiated shadows. For printing, these negatives would not work very well.
Also, the images very clearly show the significant underexposure that's to be expected by rating this so optimistically, although that did help reeling in the skies which would otherwise have been lost in a virtually featureless block of density.
Some of the issues may be due to the scanning step; I'm not sure how that was done, but e.g. the 'hot edge' and the odd density artifact in the bottom left of the other sheet could also be explained by that. However, the Foma sheets have come out reasonably clean in comparison.
Mind you, I think the results are relatively good given the simplicity of your solution compared to a tray-based system, which requires a little more attention to dial in correctly (don't expect this to work like normal camera film).
This is just a very tricky film to work with and I think that this example demonstrates how there's really no easy answer to its inherent challenges.
