WWII colour images

railwayman3

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
2,817
Format
35mm
Very interesting. I would suggest probably taken on Kodachrome.....I've read that it was used quite a lot during WW2 (apparently there was even a Kodachrome lab in Berlin up to the time the US entered the war?), but that most photos and newsreel film were originally published in B&W at the time (even if take in color) simply because of the cost, time and complications of color reproduction, which would have been unnecessary and impractical in wartime conditions,
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
"Only about 3,000 images were taken in total."

In Germany colour photography was considered of greater importance for the propaganda units. It was to be used where colour was decisive for the photograph, and only then. These units belonged to the few who were supplied with colour films. With cine stock for foreign colour editions of the weekly newsreel, and with still films mainly for a bi-weekly all-colour foreign magazin that had editions in many languages ( a Life version by the Wehrmacht).
Yes, Kodachrome was available in the early years of the war. It is not clear to what extent it was allocated.
 

GRHazelton

Subscriber
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
2,245
Location
Jonesboro, G
Format
Multi Format
Somewhere I saw a post of Kodachrome 4 x 5 shots taken in WW II defense plants in the US. They were wonderful! Taken by an expert, well lighted, etc. The pix above might have been medium format, certainly that would have been more likely for the Montgomery and King George shot. There were many color movie "gun camera" shots of aerial combat taken, I imagine, on Kodachrome. Somewhere I have a Photographer's Mate manual from the mid 50s. It deals with the Medalist and Graphic 4 x 5, I don't remember whether it discusses color film.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,132
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Thank you
 

1kgcoffee

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2017
Messages
500
Location
Calgary
Format
Medium Format
Better than portra in my opinion. Like portra and velvia had a baby.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
None of these are actual fighting scenes and by this with some ease large-fomats could have been used*, and likely were. Kodachrome was available as sheet film, modern Agfacolor only in 35mm, Also it are the allied photographs that mostly have survived the war. All this has to be taken into account when evaluating military WWII photography.


* to be fair: a Graflex was even a standard camera for US Army photographers
 

Svenedin

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Messages
1,191
Location
Surrey, United Kingdom
Format
Med. Format RF
Thank you very much for posting those. Amazing images to see in colour. I was particularly interested to see the hospital patients outside in Summer in the sunshine and the Avro factory in Manchester. There were some ghost images in the factory shot suggesting it was a long exposure which also seems to have caused rather washed out colour. King George VI being briefed by Monty and the Ace Spitfire pilot complete with black lab are also excellent. It is a (still current) military joke that black labradors are issued in stores to officers and have a NATO serial number on them.
 

BMbikerider

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
2,915
Location
UK
Format
35mm
What I find surprising, especially in the crowded street scenes that they all appear to be sharp. Considering the film was almost certainly the original Kodachrome with a speed of 10 ISO and the shot inside the Dakota with the Paratroops. it is obviously flash but the quality is simply outstanding.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…