True, under those conditions.
But for me a photograph where there is interaction with a willing person is far more interesting. You can tell a story together.
Making photographs of people or famous people without their participation is just not something I would be interested in doing. Because I think about what I would do with the picture afterward, which is nothing. It would be a waste of my time.
That's why I laid out that to me it's irrelevant whether the person in front of the lens is a celebrity, an anonymous person, or a monkey for all I care. If there is no connection or participation - how can that photograph be valuable to you?