[QUOTE="
Look who promoted him...another lousy photog who was also a curator. He took some of the most boring photos imaginable. So of course he thinks Egg is great. I blame it on the curators, who are not world class photogs themselves.[/QUOTE]
I'm assuming you are referring to Szarkowski? I dunno...I liked John...he's done some great things for photography.
[QUOTE="
Look who promoted him...another lousy photog who was also a curator. He took some of the most boring photos imaginable. So of course he thinks Egg is great. I blame it on the curators, who are not world class photogs themselves.
I'm assuming you are referring to Szarkowski? I dunno...I liked John...he's done some great things for photography.
Jason[/QUOTE]
Yes, Szarkowski was great, and championed Eggleston and so many other photographers now recognized as masters. His eye for talent was true, and of course there is no need to be a photographer at all in order to be a successful curator, historian, critic, etc.
Yes, Szarkowski was great, and championed Eggleston and so many other photographers now recognized as masters. His eye for talent was true, and of course there is no need to be a photographer at all in order to be a successful curator, historian, critic, etc.[/QUOTE]
Yes, he did a lot for some great photographers...there is a wonderful documentary about Dorthea Lang...and he's featured in a great Ansel Adams Doc.
J