• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Why your early 2000s photos are probably lost forever

loccdor

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2024
Messages
2,546
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
People are as strange as you make them.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,809
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,321
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm

I see a lot of difference between sharing thoughts on a photographic forum about matters that are problem specific and sharing much more personal things like photos but I was only stating my feelings on the matter I was not in anyway suggesting that others should view the matter in the same way

pentaxuser
 

djdister

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 6, 2012
Messages
266
Location
Maryland USA
Format
Multi Format
That BBC article is obviously written for people who don't know how to save files created since 2000. I still have my very first digital image files from circa 2001 or so, and all digital images created since then. How is that so hard?
 

retina_restoration

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 28, 2023
Messages
1,545
Location
Wilammette Valley, Oregon
Format
35mm RF
That BBC article is obviously written for people who don't know how to save files created since 2000. I still have my very first digital image files from circa 2001 or so, and all digital images created since then. How is that so hard?
My digital archive still contains the first digital film scan I ever had done (professionally) from 1995.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,321
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Luckily, Shakespeare and Picasso and Cartier-Bresson and Mozart and thousands of other people didn't agree with you.

I believe that what I said and the context in which makes it somewhat different from your analogy.

pentaxuser
 
OP
OP

albireo

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Messages
1,619
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
That BBC article is obviously written for people who don't know how to save files created since 2000. I still have my very first digital image files from circa 2001 or so, and all digital images created since then. How is that so hard?

Did you read the entire article? One of her points was that consumer backup solutions were not as standardised as they are today, they were not as cheap, there was no USB-C, so things ended up backed up, when they did, on a pot-pourri of different media, most of which still physical. Unless you put your mind to doing this backup thing methodically, that is, and many people people in her age group then didn't care about RAID-0.

I suspect the vast majority of people started methodically backing up when Apple Iphones and iCloud did it for them by default.

The author also moved around a lot so things got lost in the process.
 
Last edited:

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,321
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm

I repeat what I said to Don You have to look at what I said and the context in which it was said and in that context I am not sure what those opportunities are of which I am robbing myself

To rob myself of an opportunity(ies) I'd have to be able to recognise what it or those are and I cannot see what it or they might be

I have to say I don't experience any sense of lost opportunities from not placing my photos in the gallery

pentaxuser
 

Alan Edward Klein

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
10,141
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
I'd like to think we're more friendly than absolute strangers that we just bumped into in the street. Most people like to share the results of their hobby with other enthusiasts more than checking with them to get answers to your problems. Maybe we can be more friendly if you;d start by adding your picture and real name to your avatar?
 

Alan Edward Klein

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
10,141
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format

I;ve got dozens of DVDs of old pictues. I usually dumped two DVDs so I;d have a backup. Some of my DVD's have failed, though, so the extra backup has helped.
 

djdister

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 6, 2012
Messages
266
Location
Maryland USA
Format
Multi Format

"Consumer backup solutions" are not needed. I've had hard drives since pre-2000 and when I moved to a new computer I just transferred my files from the old hard drive to the newer one. Sometimes I copied files from 3.5 floppies, Zip drives, CDR/DVDR and etc onto the newer hard drive, without once touching "consumer backup solutions" and without RAID. Now I have my own NAS that uses RAID, but again, how is that so hard? There has always been a way to move files from a variety of physical media onto new physical media, with very little exception.

I'm surprised that a BBC article has a title like a TikTok or YouTube video.
 

Alan Edward Klein

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
10,141
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format

I agree. Also, what trust should readers have if opinions given are not backed up with samples of work or samples explaining the recommendation? How do you know they know what they're reecommending is valid or just a guess?
 

retina_restoration

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 28, 2023
Messages
1,545
Location
Wilammette Valley, Oregon
Format
35mm RF
To rob myself of an opportunity(ies) I'd have to be able to recognise what it or those are and I cannot see what it or they might be
Sure, and that's your choice to make.
For myself, I choose "yes" more often than "no", because when I say "no" to something I can guarantee that nothing will happen, so I prefer to leave the door open for whatever can happen.
 

mzjo

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 9, 2023
Messages
14
Location
France
Format
35mm
Very interesting to read all your views after having read the article. I am a slightly older generation, I have a lot of negatives saved from the 1960's onwards, also several boxes of slides taken by my dad in East Africa (family but also wider subjects). My contribution doesn't start really until the mid 70's and a lot is quite frankly rubbish but I keep them. I lost about 15 years of colour negatives when they stuck to the file sleeves (my b&w negs both home developed and lab developed didn't suffer!). So, for me, the notion of losing digital photos through storage failure of one form or another is far from the whole story. All photographic material can be lost. Even those digital photos printed on the family inkjet are far from eternal. The solutions for keeping photos, digital or analog, are many and are very personal. I refuse to store photos on cloud storage (although I have nothing against sharing digital copies, analog or digital primary matter, when it seems appropriate; I'm just very shy about sharing my rubbish with experts). That's my choice. I'm not professional or even semi-professional, just a bloke who takes pictures! I'm also the only one in the family who uses a camera rather than a phone to take pictures and my wife regularly commands me to download the contents of her phone! (This is where photos get lost). As well as all the colour negs lost (but most of the prints survive!) I also lost a whole year of digital photos (mine) and I don't know how. It was probably a false move clearing a card! It was a thin year and some of the most important ones have been recovered!

Conclusion: everyone is different, everyone's experience is different, everyone's ideals are different and the technical solutions vary accordingly. That's our choice and we have to accept the consequences. Failing to back things up shows that you're not really afraid of losing them. All technology can break down (as can human-beings) but to blame our failings on the tech is a bit soft.
And yes, I have lived through marriage breakdown (one of the worst things for photo storage in my experience), house moves, country changes and a few other things. It doesn't change my opinion.
 

gbroadbridge

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
867
Location
Sydney, Australia
Format
Medium Format
It all boils down to the fact that anything someone considers important at the time is preserved, else it is left to fend for itself.

I have photos going back to when I started my photographic journey around 1974, no negatives survived before the mid '80's (although prints were saved by my parents). Negs since then were scanned by the best available tech at the time - most of the negs are sad or lost, but the scans survive.

Many don't deserve to survive, but too much work to cull them.

Other non photo things along the way survived many years, but then I decided they were of no interest to anyone so they went back into elemental form. Sometimes now I regret those culls

It was no hardship along the way to keep things I felt important preserved - tech may change but there was always a migration path. 30 years ago I had many HDD's backed up to CD's, which evolved to backup DVD, which evolved to Bluray, and then to multiple NAS, and now multiple NAS/AWS.

It's all documented in my estate should anyone care about the backups after I croak.

All the photos that are important to my family are printed and stored in albums - which is the ultimate backup that is easy to peruse.
They can toss as they see fit when I no longer care.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,054
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
It all boils down to the fact that

I think it also boils down to a bit of a cautionary tale: When the paradigm shifts in a fairly major way, be cautious about assumptions and choices based on past experiences.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,321
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm

Sorry but the point I was making but clearly unsuccessfully, has nothing to do with your second sentence above nor is it a declaration that I consider the site to consist of less than friendly members. Nor was I suggesting that others should not share their pictures. It's their choice

I simply chose not share any prints I make for the reasons I mentioned and furthermore because I consider most of my pics to be private within a small circle of friends and relatives only and largely of no interest or benefit to others. By the same token I chose not to present a picture of myself as you seem to have asked that I do

When I first joined I saw many nicknames being used and under those nicknames pictures of Humphrey Bogart and others so while not seeing the point in using pictures of others I did chose a nickname which seemed to be the "done thing"

Given what has happened to privacy in the interim 20 years and what I perceive as the current trend of privacy exploitation it makes complete sense to me to be more careful than ever and I cannot see why my real name and picture adds any useful information to others in terms of the reciprocal benefit of my presence or otherwise, here on Photrio

We are probably destined to not be able to reach any agreement on this matter so like any other matter on Photrio we may have to agree to disagree and leave it at that

pentaxuser
 

4season

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
2,123
Format
Plastic Cameras
A lot of my early digital photos are gone because I simply didn't have sufficient storage space to keep them. IIRC, my Powerbook Duo had a 340 megabyte hard drive, which was considered pretty large in the 1990s, but it filled up very quickly once I got a digital camera. The advent of Zip and CD-R disks helped, but we're still talking about 100 and 600 megabytes, respectively. Even circa 2005, I was having to make do with a pair of 2-gigabyte SD cards with my first serious digicam, and it was a struggle even when shooting only JPEGs. I didn't appreciate the significance of it's raw output capability, but even if I had, write times were terrible when shooting raw, like ~4 seconds per image.

My memory of SD card pricing circa 2005 is hazy, but I could've sworn a 2 gb SD card cost around 80 USD.