Why Pyrol rather than hydroquinone?

gainer

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
3,699
I hate it when people call me Mr. Gainer. It makes me feel older than I am, and that's not easy to do.

Of course, I know people are using lith developers for other than lithography. That's a misnomer anyway. Who uses rocks? But if it's not fundamentally a lith developer, how can one say "I used a lith developer for a full scale landscape."? So what makes a lith developer a lith developer? What do you mean by "lithing" if not high contrast and infectious development?

Now, if a developer that produces only two levels of density on film designed for lithography is applied to HP5+ or 400TX, say, we don't expect only two density levels, but we can't get the effect of using a lith developer without using a developer that could be used in lithography. Or am I missing something?
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
 

gainer

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
3,699
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
 

Tom Hoskinson

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
3,867
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
 

sanking

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2003
Messages
5,437
Location
Greenville,
Format
Large Format
 
Last edited by a moderator:

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
 

Bob Carnie

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
7,735
Location
toronto
Format
Med. Format RF
Dan
I am doing quite a bit of lith printing in fact started in 1997 and it is part of my weekly production.
I hesitate to enter this discussion as my background is entirely practical with no scientific credentials. Though I do make a living making lith prints.
It seems to me you are trying to come up with a good workable formulation for lith printing. My comments to you in other posts (different threads) were that Champion Nova Lith is the best mix I have used.I have tried some of the formulas from unblinking eye as well I have used the kodak lith chemicals. All of these pale by comparison to Champion.
I have noticed that with Champion when mixing the b with the a there is a milky white formation happening . this does not happen with any of the other combinations that I have had mixed up.I bought 10 5 gallon mixes of Champion as I rely on this developer working every day consistantly. If you would be interested I would send you some a and b to test with the mixes you are using and see if there is a difference.
If you have a formula that makes the blacks pop after 3 minutes and gives the creamy highlights then you are on to a good thing. But I know kodak mix will not do this as well as two of the formulas posted on unblinking eye. They work but nowhere near Champion.
 

Helen B

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
1,590
Location
Hell's Kitch
Format
Multi Format
Sandy enquired, perhaps rhetorically:

"Specifically, what is it about infectious development that can be achieved with hydroquinone and not with pyrogallol and pyrocatechin?"

Is it that semiquinone is sufficiently active to cause infectious development, and that semiquinone is formed by the reaction between hydroquinone and quinone (as long as there is no more than a very low concentration of sulphite ions and in the presence of a necessary small amount of bromide ions)?

But on the other hand... fogging of the adjacent grains can be accomplished by other substances, including the reaction product of hydrazine (for example) and the oxidised developer. The result of fogging adjacent grains is similar, but not identical, to infectious development.

The distinction between infectious development and fogging is that infectious development refers to the development of grains with latent sub-image centres while fogging refers to the development of unexposed grains.

How does that sound? I'm not suggesting that semiquinone is the only substance capable of causing infectious development. I don't know the answer to that question. I'm not sure that I know any answers really.

Best,
Helen
 

sanking

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2003
Messages
5,437
Location
Greenville,
Format
Large Format

I understand that all of the formulas contain hydroquinone, but that in and for itself does not mean that other reducers could not also be used. Lith printing is a fairly new technique and it would be expected that most people working with it are simply adopting the few formulas that have to this point been recommended. I have no idea if procatechin or pyrogallol would work as well, or better, than hydroquinone, but unless someone has actually tried these reducers and found that they don't work I would certainly withold my own judgement about their usefullness.

Sandy
 

Tom Hoskinson

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
3,867
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
It seems to me that the articles and patent I cited in my previous post either imply or state that several developing agents are capable of infectious development and are also useful in Lithographic development.

Several of these are dihydroxybenzene developing agents (including, but not limited to hydroquinone) and several are not.

It would seem to me that testing is indeed indicated before any judgements are made about usefulness or lack thereof of any of these developing agents in lithographic applications.
 

Helen B

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
1,590
Location
Hell's Kitch
Format
Multi Format
Reading the articles and patent quoted by Tom made me think that 'infectious development' is applied with a more general meaning than the specific one I used in my attempt to reconcile the two viewpoints (there being two different mechanisms of lithographic development, not one. One of those mechanisms appears to be rather special, and one does not).

Best,
Helen
 

gainer

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
3,699
I suspect that the fact that hydroquinone WILL do the job in a properly formulated developer and is less expensive (at least for me) than others that would also do the job is the real reason it is used in commercial developers. That is not a pronouncement, just an observation.
 

sanking

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2003
Messages
5,437
Location
Greenville,
Format
Large Format
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
Kirk Keyes said:
Perhaps the high density of the lith image
makes the stain not noticable.

Just what I was thinking possible. Many years ago I did
process camera work and half tone processing. I was not
looking for color then but on reflection do not recall any.
Those little dots are small and/or compressed and all
very dense.

The little lith printing I've done shows the dense portions
to be black, warm at best, while any less dense areas shade
from light tans to very dark browns; at least with my
homebrew lith. Dan
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…