You didn't ask him why he isn't driving a Toyota Prius?
I thanked him for his time and gave him my card, saying "drop me an email if you would like copies".
It was fun
You didn't ask him why he isn't driving a Toyota Prius?
he asked why I still shot film when digital is faster, cheaper, and better (I wasn't going to debate the point with him).
Cheaper?! I still spend less in a year on film than what some digital hacks pay for a single lens! Of which they have many. Of which they replace regularly. And that's to say nothing of digital camera bodies and software...
Just tell them its because digital image quality sucks. Because it does.
That was true once, but no longer. I know people doing very good digital work. Probably about the same percentage (for serious photographers) as people doing good analog work. Although I am 100% analog, from start to finish, I don't see how you can make a blanket statement like that. I can't wait until the "us vs. them" mentality disappears. It makes us look petty,and insecure, in our own endeavors.Just tell them its because digital image quality sucks. Because it does.
After thinking for a moment, I replied, "That's like asking a painter why he doesn't just take a picture."
That was true once, but no longer. I know people doing very good digital work. Probably about the same percentage (for serious photographers) as people doing good analog work. Although I am 100% analog, from start to finish, I don't see how you can make a blanket statement like that. I can't wait until the "us vs. them" mentality disappears. It makes us look petty,and insecure, in our own endeavors.
Here we go again. Thank goodness for Eddie's post.
The "quality" ship has long since sailed. In fact purely from an image quality perspective digital has been ahead for a while now.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?