They ALREADY made a TMAX25... It was called Kodak Technical Pan.... Duh!!!.... :munch:
What I mean to say is {and I hate saying it because Ilford is the only main player now, and I'm all for their efforts, and because some people may be mad at me} but I always found Ilford films to be rather bland, w/o the "guts" of Agfa or the "character" of Kodak {FP4 ain't bad, though}. Maybe Ilford should hire some non-English designers? to make their films?
Denial guys I only shoot 5% of 100ISO to 95% of 400ISO I do have a bulk loader of PanF but it lasts a while.
...eg A.Adams esq.
Really? My statistics say:
20% at Iso 50 or lower
28% at Iso 100
24% at Iso 400
12% above Iso 400
(the rest at Isos in between)
Intercontinental Photo Facts !
USA in Mono film is predominantly a 400 iso film market, everywhere else much more an even split between 100 iso / 400 iso films.
The USA typically prefer warmer image tones with less contrast ( about a grade ) than European
other markets vary.
These are 'true' statements but obviously huge numbers of exceptions and variations....eg A.Adams esq.
Simon ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited :
Modern day photographers really have become a bunch of whimps. Can't handhold a camera with 25 ISO Film pffft. I wonder how they did it before WWI and WWII. I've seen plenty of photographs made with handheld cameras ( Goerz Ango, Box Cameras, etc...) and slow glass plates or film and they were plenty sharp and shot under very different lighting conditions from brigh sunshine to rainy and foggy days. Those photographers didn't use super fast lenses either so how did they do it. I guess great technique.
Also grain is a minor reason for choosing slow films the bigger reason is the different tonality a slightly higher inherent contrast, etc...
As weird as it sound slower films are the right films for grey and foggy days with little contrast, the slower films just add a little necessary uumph that makes the scene come alive.
Modern day photographers really have become a bunch of whimps. Can't handhold a camera with 25 ISO Film pffft. I wonder how they did it before WWI and WWII. I've seen plenty of photographs made with handheld cameras ( Goerz Ango, Box Cameras, etc...) and slow glass plates or film and they were plenty sharp and shot under very different lighting conditions from brigh sunshine to rainy and foggy days. Those photographers didn't use super fast lenses either so how did they do it. I guess great technique.
Also grain is a minor reason for choosing slow films the bigger reason is the different tonality a slightly higher inherent contrast, etc...
As weird as it sound slower films are the right films for grey and foggy days with little contrast, the slower films just add a little necessary uumph that makes the scene come alive.
Thomas I mostly agree with your view but imo slow films have a natively different contrast than most faster films. Can I mimic the look with faster film by say developing a bit longer or using more agitation sure but it will also change some other aspects of the film longer development to get more contrast also gives me more grain, more agitation supposedly somewhat reduces edge contrast. What I am saying is that you don't get a free lunch if you change a variable you will have to pay for the change.
Ilford films bland?
FP4+:
My wife Alicia:
Dead Link Removed
Dead Link Removed by Roger Cole, on Flickr
What I mean to say is {and I hate saying it because Ilford is the only main player now, and I'm all for their efforts, and because some people may be mad at me} but I always found Ilford films to be rather bland, w/o the "guts" of Agfa or the "character" of Kodak {FP4 ain't bad, though}. Maybe Ilford should hire some non-English designers? to make their films?
the idea behind tabular grain was to have large grain surfaces to collect a max of light and therefore making highly sensitive film with relatively small grain.an ISO of 25 does not fit that strategy.just get an ISO 25 film f that is what you are after or incease your film format and don't fall foy the trap of miracle developers.they don't work grain is a film and not a developer characteristic.
Tabular crystals fit that strategy perfect, as long as technically feasable.
Grain is in first instance a film issue, but some films just do not work well with standard developers, as those high-resolutiuon films.
What high-resolution films?; Tmax seems rather soft to me,buIan makes a good point.overagitation is a problemas it is killing acutance.however I'm comitted to rotation development and happilylive with the consequences.
What high-resolution films?
Modern day photographers really have become a bunch of whimps. Can't handhold a camera with 25 ISO Film pffft. I wonder how they did it before WWI and WWII. I've seen plenty of photographs made with handheld cameras ( Goerz Ango, Box Cameras, etc...) and slow glass plates or film and they were plenty sharp and shot under very different lighting conditions from brigh sunshine to rainy and foggy days. Those photographers didn't use super fast lenses either so how did they do it. I guess great technique.
Also grain is a minor reason for choosing slow films the bigger reason is the different tonality a slightly higher inherent contrast, etc...
As weird as it sound slower films are the right films for grey and foggy days with little contrast, the slower films just add a little necessary uumph that makes the scene come alive.
You amputated your wife's foot! And you are still alive!??
Ewww! You need to figure out how to expose and develop properly. No1 culprit is usually over-agitation. But really, before I buy a word of this, I'd like to see comparisons side by side of your own work with Ilford, Kodak and Agfa films. All this visceral stuff without at least some visual support is not helpful to the discussion.
Roger Regarding your points
1. I specifically said Handheld ( I've seen thousands of handheld photographs prints and negs made in the early 1900 some are out of focus, some showed camera movement but a large portion of them was sharp even by todays standards.
2. I agree with you
3. Just like we do now
4. Just like today
5. Changes tonality
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?