Why no "Tele-Leica" M"

blockend

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
5,049
Location
northern eng
Format
35mm
I bought an OM1 new in the 1970s, and a very nice camera it was. My point was that the company were primarily committed to shrinking the body, not the stable of lenses which were only slightly smaller than, say, Canon's offerings. For an SLR to compete with rangefinder cameras in size, pancake lenses are a necessity. These are possible in normal and wide-normal focal lengths, at the penalty of smaller apertures and darker viewing systems. The advantage of Olympus OM cameras was in overall body-lens weight, not size. I made no comment about the quality of the cameras or lenses.
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format

Hope it fits an accessory shoe.
 
Last edited:

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,469
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I made the decision almost 40 years ago when I bought my first camera. I want an SLR and not an RF. The same thing still applied for me today. I wan an SLR and not a camera without mirror. Although the RF does have the mirrors.

The laws of physics and photography have not changed since you and I made that decision.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…