Why is it or is it?

Dave Wooten

Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2004
Messages
2,723
Location
Vegas/myster
Format
ULarge Format
Often one hears that "round catch lights are more natural and therefore more acceptable". Is that because the sun is round? Some prefer the look of window light as catch lights, why is that. Which is more primal, the catch light of the open sun or the "window light" of the open cave?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
Opinion, opinion, opinion!
The ones I find odd are from ringlights. Or from multiple lights.
 

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format
I think that round catchlights are more natural looking because it is a geometry that is repeated in the pupil and iris, as oppossed to two circles and a sqaure. Hard right angles are not the most common human feature. (try to restrain yourself)
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,245
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
I find this rather odd - the sun is essentially a point source, and the reflection of the sun in an eye would certainly be a point!

The most common large-but-bounded diffuse light source is rectangular: A window.

Illustrators and cartoonists often put in a reflection of a window to show "roundness", so why is it wrong to do it in a photograph?

I asked a local portrait photographer (a good one, won lost of international prices and stuff) about this, and he couldn't answer...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…