It's interesting how we all seem to come from different direction to what seems to be the same conclusion .
I just what to thank all that participated here , I have come back to reread some of your posts and find them fascinating .
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Phenix:
"2. The process imperfections, and even faults, like errors and blemishes in developing and manipulating the film and the print. These imperfections seem to emphasize different priorities between form and content, setting big value on the content. In this case, if form had been closer to perfection, the content’s value would have suffered. Here there’s also a sub-category: of the artificially vintaged images. These are fakes, as the imperfect form sends the message there would be a content value in them, but in reality, there is no content value at all, except for melodrama. This is a cheap, pathetic trick, call it “postmodern” (I hate postmodernism)."
"artificially vintaged images" could you elaborate a bit or better yet show examples of these?
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Nicholas Lindan, thank you for your thoughts they brought me back to my childhood , my mother was a sound engineer for a movie studio , I can relate to what you are saying about a "perfect noise"
______________________________________________________________________________________
Ole , how can you live in such godforsaken imperfect place
, I am sure nature has revealed it's powerful "imperfections" there, the closest I ever got to where you are is northern tip of Russia, I can not remember exactly where now , but I remember that Finland was on the other side ...
__________________________________________________________________
Once again thanks to all ... if you have other thoughts on this please post , we may just evolve to something different in our work by thinking out loud here
ILYA