Hi All,
I am frequently reading that folks are advised to use a Mamiya 6 or 7 (i'm thinking these rangefinder cameras) over an RB/RZ67 for landscape photography b/c they're better in this application.
Is this true? Why? What makes a rangefinder better if both are on sturdy tri-pod and the SLR is employing MLU?
By better, i ultimately mean higher IQ.
I'm not versed in Mamiya rangefinders, but in response to Steve's comment
a Hasselblad setup can be put together for under $1000 with some intelligent buying, I've not seen a single Mamiya 7 kit go for less than $850, and often times for $1200-1500.
so this 'affording a hasselblad' stuff is nonsense, I would know, I'm a sophomore in college and I have a small 500EL/M kit.
and I would imagine, as the others have said, that the Mamiya 7 is desirable for its weight and desirable lenses.
I think it's more about understanding Steve's humor
4) Steve has a strange sense of humor
Don't overlook the mirror in the RB/RZ. It is huge and will play havoc with image quality at slower shutter speeds every time it fires, even on a good tripod. I have had an entire roll ruined because I forgot this fact. One way to overcome this issue is to use mirror lockup and a cable release. This helps a lot!
If I did more color work, I would probably lean toward the RZ. But, I also agree with BetterSense. If I'm going to carry that much weight, I might as well carry the 4x5.
Thanks for so many great comments!!!
To sum things up to this point, i'm seeing:
Steve has a strange sense of humor
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?