Has this ever happened in the history of the world though? It would be extremely brazen if not insane to use the police and insurance to steal something, with an extremely low chance of success.
In the US, stolen property remains the owned by the original owner, not the possessor... even if the current possessor obtained it through legal purchase. So if someone’s able to concoct a claim, law enforcement or civil action can be taken to repatriate the stolen property with the rightful owner. In the case of a camera.. I can’t imagine anyone so desperately willing to take such fraudulent action. But such an accusation would seriously defame and inconvenience the victim of such fraud.
I look for the serial number because for some equipment it tells when it was make. Without that information or if the seller will not provide it, I move on.
A faker could also inquire.
In the US, stolen property remains the owned by the original owner, not the possessor... even if the current possessor obtained it through legal purchase.
I think some people do it because they are paranoid. If you ask them why they do it they probably can't provide an answer. However, to me and a lot of people posting here, it really brings into question if the camera was stolen or the seller is afraid it was stolen. I had a Leica M4 and lenses stolen some years back, and a Minolta CLE about 5 years ago. I filed police reports on both. The police are diligent on tracking pawn dealers and other sources. I've watched the internet and wonder where do these cameras go? I think once the thief realizes what he stole is worthless he throws it away.
Things like this have happened.Some guy in Virginia is going to see his stolen camera advertised on ebay, from a California seller who bought it from some guy named Biff or Bob or something in Tucson? How is that gonna work? Crossing several states, who you gonna prosecute, and where? It's just........ridiculous.
Some guy in Virginia is going to see his stolen camera advertised on ebay, from a California seller who bought it from some guy named Biff or Bob or something in Tucson? How is that gonna work? Crossing several states, who you gonna prosecute, and where? It's just........ridiculous.
I just hate that EXIF contains both serial numbers. I don't know why this kind of information should be included in EXIF at all.
Why? As if we aren't being identified and tracked online enough. This is not just personal but I see this as global issue. People don't even understand that they are sending GPS positions inside their photos to rest of the world.
Why does this matter? Because the information is always used against us; profiling, tracking and business made with this data without our concent. This is not about my single photo, scale this issue to millions of photos and you probably would like to own that data, too.
Some guy in Virginia is going to see his stolen camera advertised on ebay, from a California seller who bought it from some guy named Biff or Bob or something in Tucson? How is that gonna work? Crossing several states, who you gonna prosecute, and where? It's just........ridiculous.
Agreed. Absurd paranoia.
Well, again, you don't need to prosecute to get your stolen stuff back. Prosecution is irrelevant. I've gotten stolen items back after 20 years, but nobody was prosecuted because the statute of limitations was long expired and the person who possessed it at the time didn't know it was stolen. Unfortunate for them, but life isn't always fair.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?