I thought it was for more tilt... The distance between real center and the lens center acts as a lever arm
But there is no such need. Most shots that use tilt use relatively little, and there's more than enough on a Technika, particularly when you factor in indirect tilt methods like tilting the back and righting the camera. I've run out of front rise on a Technika when photographing a tall building, necessitating the use of indirect rise (tilting back and front, pointing the camera up until both standards are plumb), but never front tilt.
A Technika has no fall on either standard (except by dropping the bed and using front rise and tilt to correct, which doesn't give you much), however, when the camera is mounted right side up. Mounting the lens in the lowest position gives you the maximum front rise, and if you need front fall, you mount the camera upside down or potentially on its side, if you've got a strong enough tripod head for that. There is a tripod screw under the accessory shoe for mounting the camera upside down, and Linhof also made an "Outrigger Arm" that could be attached to a tripod as another method of upside-down mounting. The back rotates 360 degrees, and there are focusing knobs on both sides.