- Joined
- Jun 29, 2013
- Messages
- 2
- Format
- 4x5 Format
eBay is photographic prices are often driven by greed, lack of market knowledge, and pure stupidity.
only a few years ago a brass lens was considered JUNK and cost maybe 30$
the same lens now costs between 600 and 800$
the reason that polaroid back is $$ is for the same reason ... someone will pay that much money for it
There's also the economic rule of "expectations of inflation cause inflation", in that if I think I can buy/sell a lens for $200 in a few years, and it's only $100 now, I'll buy now and either save/make money on the future price. That's how property/stockmarket/tulip bubbles form. Maybe we're in a lens bubble, and the prices will crash in a few years?
In this case there would be an upper limit as long as new PA-145s are available. They're not cheap but surely there's no reason to pay more for an old Polaroid holder.
In a perfect world, with so-called 'perfect knowledge', yes. But fleabay is not a perfect world, sometimes it benefits the buyers (when sellers don't know what they're selling and one canny buyer knows its true value and noone else notices).
But sometimes it benefits the sellers (especially when the buyers don't do their research).
I present exhibit A, the Voigtlander Nokton 40mm f/1.4, brand new at B+H, US$450 for either Multi- or Single-Coated versions.
Now let me present exhibit B, the exact same lens brand new, sold for 440 on fleabay (US$580). That's the most expensive one that's actually sold, but there are some listed for US$800 up there.
Again, it's a lens I would like, but I'm not paying more than $300 second-hand. I may eventually give up and buy one new from B+H. Or buy two, and resell one on fleabay for more than I paid at B+H.
If you can't beat 'em, join 'em.
The classic approach of the industry was to offer tools (cameras etc.) at resonable or even low prices to gain by that entry into use and sale of their expendables (films etc.).
Whether this still comes true for Fuji and their packfilm is questionable.
Placing the film holder at a premium price will exclude a lot of the consumers from the film, which in turn will be discontinued by Fujifilm because of (surprise!) low demand. They're killing the medium.
$150 was quite cheap. the inflation calculator http://www.dollartimes.com/calculators/inflation.htm says, that $69 in 1978 is $260.90 now...I remember buying a Polaroid #405 new in the box back from a Polaroid distributor in the late seventies. I paid $69 and that was a lot of dough at the time. Now recently I bought one and I thought I got a good deal at a bit under $150. Who would have guessed?
$150 was quite cheap. the inflation calculator http://www.dollartimes.com/calculators/inflation.htm says, that $69 in 1978 is $260.90 now...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?