- Joined
- Dec 10, 2009
- Messages
- 6,297
- Format
- Multi Format
I primarily print platinum/palladium. While I enjoy the process, it is with an aim toward the result. I would not do it for the process alone. I do not photograph for the act of photographing.When I was a senior in college, almost every evening I used to sit on the cliffs overlooking the ocean and fish. Many times I caught my dinner. Once there was a huge run of mackerel. You could tie six shiny hooks onto the leader, no bait, cast it out, and before it sank there were six fish on the line. It was no fun at all, just a lot of hard work hauling in the fish.
At my job, I work on difficult and complicated and challenging problems to get to an answer and a final report. If I could get to the answer just by pressing a button, I'd look for a different job. All the satisfaction is in the work and very little is in getting the result.
I grow my garden because I love watching the seeds sprout and taking care of the plants and watching them grow. Sure a homegrown tomato tastes better than a store-bought one, but that's beside the point. I could go to a farmers' market and get someone else's homegrown tomatoes if that's all that mattered. Walking in a garden you planted and cared for yourself has its own satisfaction. Not everything is about the final result.
jtk, when you say "files" are you talking digital files or negatives? If digital, do you expect those files to be useful in 100 years?
What does this mean?I don't shoot C41 because it's so transient.
Get them on Cloud, portable drives are notoriously bad for long term storage..Arthur, when I say "files" that's what I mean. I've scanned most of the 35mm and MF negs I care about as well as the hundreds of historic and family photos (print and neg) from late 19th century. Those files are all backed up on external Hard Drives as well (recently) on "thumb drives." The only known problem with thumb drives is that they're easily misplaced.
Yes, those digital files are sure to be around in future centuries, to the extent that anybody cares and assuming that I don't destroy them. As soon as I've settled on a "cloud" system all of that material will be available there as well. Easy to do, takes zero time.
My 35mm scans are all grain-sharp thanks to Nikon, better than printing optically. My medium format scans are as good up to 16X20 as the film itself, but unlike 35mm, not beyond (vintage Epson scanner).
I should mention that I also enjoy shooting/processing/scanning 35mm B&W and would shoot 35mm chromes if a convenient and reliable lab was still available. Naturally, I scan all of those that I care about. I don't shoot C41 because it's so transient.
Get them on Cloud, portable drives are notoriously bad for long term storage..
OP
what is it exactly that you refer to as "alternative processes" ?
seems these days anything can be considered "alternative"
i can see how silver printing might be considered alternative process
but ink /pigment prints ?
maybe if they are made by the starn twins and the photographer
does encaustic painting on them because there is some
sort of human intervention ,, but i don't think ink/pigment prints
is an alternative
I still print optically and I can without a doubt say that I put as much or probably more than you ever did into optical prints... Most great digital printers have come from optical...My impression (fwiw) is very few silver printers put as much hands-on work into their enlargements as I did when I was printing optically. Today, nobody who has failed to produce good inkjet enlargements understands the amount of "human intervention" that's involved...They fail to understand "The negative is the equivalent of the composer's score, and the print the performance." - Ansel Adams
How did you arrive at that conclusion?My impression (fwiw) is very few silver printers put as much hands-on work into their enlargements as I did when I was printing optically.
I see you are from Albuquerque - how would you rate your printing skills with Kirk Gittings, I have seen his work many times so you can back up your claims.My impression (fwiw) is very few silver printers put as much hands-on work into their enlargements as I did when I was printing optically. Today, nobody who has failed to produce good inkjet enlargements understands the amount of "human intervention" that's involved...They fail to understand "The negative is the equivalent of the composer's score, and the print the performance." - Ansel Adams
My impression (fwiw) is very few silver printers put as much hands-on work into their enlargements as I did when I was printing optically. Today, nobody who has failed to produce good inkjet enlargements understands the amount of "human intervention" that's involved...They fail to understand "The negative is the equivalent of the composer's score, and the print the performance." - Ansel Adams
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?