I think it is fair to say that if you don't have a camera and you have a need to take many photos quickly, it would make more sense to choose a digital camera for the task.
But if you already have a film camera that you like using, it can be fun to use a motor winder or drive with it.
For me, I've only added a winder when I wanted to have the ergonomic advantages that one can get from some of them, or if the winder allowed me to replace harder to find batteries with AA or AAA batteries - usually a camera that already had a slow built in power winder.
I had one on a Canon A-1, or an AE-1, can't remember. What I do remember was that it was slow and noisy. I think Canon made 2 types of winders, and that one was apparently the bargain one.
Just cause I'm nosy.
I'd've thunk that motor winders and motor drives would be the last thing anyone would want on a film camera these days. .... but who am I to judge?
As a Pentaxian I of course have winders for my LX cameras. They feature power rewind, which is nice. I like the winder on my MXs, they add just enough heft, and make sequences, regardless of the speed, easier. However, the MX winder's Achilles heel, IMO, is the tiny "cap" for the 4 AA cells. Too easy to drop, and at some point the tiny screw will strip out. Not a good idea for Pentax's foray into the Pro market.
Much nicer is the battery tray for the ME Super. Why didn't Pentax use such a tray on the MX?
More rules. Now it is when, how, what kind, and for what purpose you can use winders, if at all, with your film cameras. It is hard to keep up with all the rules. Maybe someone could do a little red book for handy reference.
Just cause I'm nosy.
I'd've thunk that motor winders and motor drives would be the last thing anyone would want on a film camera these days. .... but who am I to judge?
If we were sane, we'd be using digital. Q.E.D. ^ Sanity is overrated and far too authoritarian.Oh, I agree with you 100%. There is absolutely no sane reason for me to be attaching a MD to my cameras. Blowing a roll of film in 4 seconds these days is financially irresponsible. My motors are always set to single. I use it for the same reason I use film, just because its fun. To me it's almost like doing one of the civil war dress up thing. Get out the 'ol PJ camera and pretend I'm stalking the mean streets for a photo op.
Even shooting digital I rarely if ever use burst.
Did I mention I really like the sound?
If we were sane, we'd be using digital. Q.E.D. ^ Sanity is overrated and far too authoritarian.
Bandsaw?I got a motordrive bundled with my EOS 1N. Still haven't figure out how to remove it.
Which reminds me, I keep forgetting to order an ink sac for a mid-20s lever-fill Sheaffer "Lifetime". Anyone needs one, it's Pen Sac Co dot com. They're cheap, $2-3 each. Shipping $4 iirc.Well yeah. We'd also dich fountain pens and manual gearboxes. We like what we like and stick with it.
Where are these rules you speak of?
All I see is questions and preferences.
Don’t cut yourself on the binder twine.
I find with a Bronica Sqai a motor drive is more ergonomic and economical. The handle makes it easier to use and the batteries are AA size which are much cheaper than the ones needed if running the camera without the drive. The camera body when mounted to the drive uses the drive batteries to power it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?