I'm an IT guy; having developed computer software systems for going on 30 years.
I'm a film and digital shooter, and I am one of the minority because I will not jab one or the other, nor will I say one is better then the other. Both require talent, technical acumen, camera workflow, darkroom skills (yes both do), and both can take a lot of time, patience, both can cause a frustration, anger, and satisfaction too.
I shoot 90% film, 10% digital.
Film and digital are both fantastic ways for one to express themselves artistically. Both can be used to make awesome pictures or craaap pictures.
Film shooters are not "better" then digital shooters, and the reverse is true too.
I really wish this us-versus-them polarity would cease because as long as one is polarized, then disrespect, irrationality, and close mindedness will color their thoughts.
A pattern I have found is that film bigots believe outright lies about digital, and digital bigots believe outright lies about film.
Both film snobs and digital snobs are closed minded fools.....
Try not to get confused.
IS this a film vs digital thread?
I thought all it was about is what sort of people use film, if there is any one sort of people in particular.
Myself, i don't think there is.
So in the end of the day, it is neither about the medium, nor about the picture, but - as the thread title says - who we are.
Try not to get confused.
Upset, because someone mentions digital?
This hasn't been a thread in which anyone got upset, or treated this as a digital vs analog matter, until some "i'm the biggest snob, because i think you are all snobs" snob thought i was.
Like i said before: do try not to get confused.
Plus these forums tend to be dominated by white English speaking males and really, who wants to be around that demographic all the time?
Not sure I agree with that broad generalization.... ;-)
Thanks Nathan...I love film...but at the end of the day, it's not about the medium but the picture. ;-)
Geeeeeh... now here is someone living in blissful heaven!
Stay there, and make heavenly inspired fibre prints to show us all here on APUG! Don't touch earth ever again!
I think another film shooter category would be old souls. Not even olds people. Old souls. I am a high school freshman and I have been shooting film for a few years now. I write with fountain pens, type with a typewriter, listen to records, use a rotary phone....it's just the way I like things.
Luddite!
I like you already. As soon as you're 21 then we can go hang out at a bar, drink beer, and chat up all the luddite women.
There's Luddite women??? Holy crap!!! I can't wait till I tell the rest of the guys.
IS this a film vs digital thread?
I thought all it was about is what sort of people use film, if there is any one sort of people in particular.
Myself, i don't think there is.
So in the end of the day, it is neither about the medium, nor about the picture, but - as the thread title says - who we are.
Try not to get confused.
..ignorance is bliss. Convincing the confused is a tough thing.
At the end of the day, it's not about the medium but the ISO.
OK, or the tripod.:rolleyes:
The funny thing is that I was an IT guy for 15 years until my doctor told me that the stress was going to kill me. ( worked on mission critical healthcare systems) So I chucked it all and became an art photographer.
I've gone back to analog to deliberately make myself think about the process and to work with the restrictions of the medium (10 shots on a roll of 120 with my 6x7, I have to wait for the results, etc.).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?