I might be mistaken, but Polaroid backs exist for other Nikon F, even the 4 and 5. 250 exp. back exists for the F4: it is the MB-24.
Sure they do, but really, how much are these features used these days?
The later Nikons may be more refined, but the original F had many intriguing options that were later eliminated, such as a Polaroid back and 250 exposure back.
ahhh IC...I think I will stick with the F/F2 for robustness and add a plain prism(I don't need a meter or auto-anything).
Quick question: the plain prism and the screens between the two are interchangeable, right? I believe so but I wanted to make sure.
I didn't mean the F3 was huge, I mean it handles badly. The balance is just awful. Real top-heavy. It's pretty clear that it was designed with the motor drive in mind.
That said, the F3 is not a small camera. A Leica is a small camera. An OM is a small camera.
I would suggest that an extensive overhaul is in order for your F3 if it's film advance has deteriorated to the level of those trio! The FG is as sophisticated as any camera of that time but nobody is mistaking it's cheap feel with any of the manual F's.
The F3's film advance is smooth but if buttery smooth film advance across the whole range is the criteria, then my vote goes to the Minolta XE-7. Try it at your own risk as it may leave you wondering if there is something wrong with your other camera's film advance . . .
Every single F3 I've used has had the same feel to it. Even like new condition F3/T cameras. It makes sense, since Nikon did, after all, use the same mechanism in the EM, FG, and FG-20 that they did in the F3. It's that way by design.
Try an FG with your F3 next to it. You'll see that it is the same.
-J
It makes sense, since Nikon did, after all, use the same mechanism in the EM, FG, and FG-20 that they did in the F3.
clayne: They may be similar in 2D size looking at them from the front, but the F3 occupies a lot more volume. I don't just mean in the sense of how much water it displaces; I mean real-world, how-much-space-does-it-take-in-a-bag-or-a-pocket. I can fit my M3 with a collapsible lens in my front pocket. I couldn't fit an F3 in there even without a lens mounted.
Your photo shows the Nikon F3 with the same width as the Nikon FM3a (142mm). According to the Instruction Manual for my Nikon F3HP camera, the width of the F3 camera is 148.5mm.
Jim
The silky smoothness of the film advance lever is a pleasure.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?