Which lens for 4x5 enlarger: 135mm or 150mm?

optique

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Messages
198
Location
Houston, Tex
Format
Medium Format
The subject about says it all. This is for Beseler 45 enlarger.

I am looking at a Nikkor EL-150mm 5.6.

Will this particular lens cover 4x5?

I would like a 150mm lens for my 4x5 enlarger but it seems the 135mm may be more common.

Will all 135mm lens cover 4x5 or which do, or which should I avoid?

I need to get the lens board too.

Thanks in advance.
Steve.
 

papagene

Membership Council
Council
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
5,438
Location
Tucson, AZ
Format
Multi Format
Both lenses will cover 4x5. Which 135mm lens is it?
I have a 135 Schneider Componon-S and it covers 4x5 easily. I got it a long time ago for what was then a very good price. It has served ne very well over the years.
One advantage for the 135mm is that it will allow you to make bigger enlargements.

gene
 

Konical

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 1, 2003
Messages
1,824
Good Afternoon, Steve,

Gene is correct. For decades, I have used a 135mm Componon for 4 x 5 negatives in a Beseler MCR-X. A used Beseler lens board shouldn't be hard to find and shouldn't cost much. If you're in a hurry, just get some 1/8" tempered Masonite and cut a hole the right size. That's the way mine's mounted; someday, maybe I'll get around to finding an actual Beseler board.

Konical
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,286
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Originally I used a 150mm lens for 5x4, then I acquired a better 135mm Componon the resulting prints are just as good but the enlarger was more practical.

Ian
 
OP
OP

optique

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Messages
198
Location
Houston, Tex
Format
Medium Format
Ok. Very good. You guys are great. What did we do before the internet?

I will proceed on a Componon or Nikkor lens in 135mm. Ability to choose between 150 and 135mm makes choices easier.

B&h has a lens board for about $85 new but I will check used first.

Thanks.
Steve.
 
OP
OP

optique

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Messages
198
Location
Houston, Tex
Format
Medium Format
By the way, I saw a Componon (no -s), for sale for cheap in great condition. Is there a reason why I should shy from this?

TIA
Steve.
 

Rob Skeoch

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Apr 25, 2005
Messages
1,346
Location
Grand Valley, Ontario
Format
35mm RF
I had the Componon 150mm for years. Thought it was a great lens. I reasoned the 150 would give more even coverage than the 135... but have no proof of that.
You can't go wrong with either one... or with Nikon or Schneider for that mater.
-Rob
 

dpurdy

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
2,680
Location
Portland OR
Format
8x10 Format
I got by with a 135 Rodagon for years though it was annoying to always have to burn the corners for 16x20s. I finally got a Componon-S 150 which I love and no more corner burning. I used to have problems getting an old style 75 componon to cover 6X6 negs at large prints but then I got a 75 Nikkor and have no coverage problem at all.
Dennis
 

Anscojohn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
2,704
Format
Medium Format
The old lab rats that first taught me darkroom said use the next step up from needed coverage. Sharper, more even coverage, they said. But, like Rob, I have no real evidence this is true. Of course, lens design has changed a whole lot, I guess.
But I use a 60 for my 35mm negs; a 100 for 6x6; a 105 for 6x7. Of course, I have an extra long girder on my old Beseler.
 

nsurit

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Messages
1,808
Location
Texas Hill Country
Format
Multi Format
Steve, if you are not in a huge hurry and would have an interest in the turret lens mount for your Beseler, let me know. I have an extra I plan to sell when my stuff moves from storage into a new darkroom. Could possibly have an extra 135/150mm lens. House to be complete in mid-February. Oh, I also happen to be in the Houston area, although my storage is in San Marcos. Bill Barber
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,286
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
With my 135mm Compoon I was making 20"x30" prints and larger with good even coverage and definitely no need to burn in the corners. I also use a 240mm for 10x8's.

Ian
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,632
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
The main difference between 135 and 150 will be enlarger head height.

Optimum aperture for depth of field and minimal diffraction will be the same for both (focal length is not in the equation).

There will be slightly more falloff at the edges with the 135 but it is a very small difference.

This composite shows the light falloff of the two Componon-s lenses. 135 is in Green and 150 is in Red.



The 150 is technically sharper, as the MTF curves also favor the 150 in all cases, but, like the light falloff, the difference is small and only in the far corners.


BTW I use the 150
 

Martin Aislabie

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
1,413
Location
Stratford-up
Format
4x5 Format
Of course the 150mm lens will have less illumination fall off towards the corners of a 5x4 neg than for a 135mm lens - all other things being equal

It is the cos^4 effect coming into play – and that’s just plain physics

However, your taking lenses also have a cos^4 illumination fall off - again its just plain physics.

Very wide angle taking lenses have the most severe cos^4 fall off - hence the need for centre filters

Very long taking lenses will have very little cos^4 fall off - particularly true about the centre of the lenses axis.

Ideally you would have a cos^4 fall off matching characteristic on both your taking and enlarging lens - but you would need a whole range of matching pairs.

You also have to throw into the equation - illumination evenness of your enlarging head.

But the real question is - is it whole effect significant enough to worry about ?

The answer seems to be no - not with a decent enlarger and enlarging lens

Martin
 

fschifano

Member
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
3,196
Location
Valley Strea
Format
Multi Format
I can't compare 135 vs. 150. I have two 135's though, one an old Schneider Componon, and the other an EL-Nikkor of approximately the same vintage. The EL-Nikkor is the better of the two in this case, primarily because the Componon is a little hazy and the Nikkor has the better AR coating. Both provide even enough illumination out to the edges of the frame. The only time I notice any light fall off is when there are large areas of continuous tone extending from the center out to the edges, and then only when these areas range from the middle of the tonal range out to the highlights.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…