I also use only anti-reflective glass (different from non-glare): Tru-Vue Museum. I was thinking of switching to the acrylic version in future (Optium Museum), but that costs significantly more than the already expensive glass.
The surface of anti-reflective glass is not as tough as plain glass: the anti-reflective coating is comparatively soft and it requires care when cleaning. Non-glare glass is tougher and cheaper - because it is just a surface texture, not a surface coating. There is also non-glare acrylic - which also has a surface texture. However, non-glare glass or acrylic does not cut down on total reflection at all, it only makes it more diffuse instead of specular. The price is reduced apparent D-max and reduced definition. I don't like it. (Example of non-glare glass: Tru-Vue Conservation Reflection Control)
Anti-reflective glass does reduce reflections, in the same way that lens coating reduces reflections. The remaining reflections are specular, and are colour-tinted, just like a coated lens. Despite the drawbacks and the price, I think that the improved appearance of the print is worth it, and reflects (no pun intended) the trouble we go to to get the print just right. Anyway, my prints need all the help they can get.
There is indeed an abrasion resistant version of Acrylite. Just to avoid confusion with anti-reflective materials, it is called AR.
Best,
Helen