Open-aperture metering on an M42 body requires an extension to the mount standard with an extra pin or coupling. A few different manufacturers each came up with their own extension to the standard. To get open aperture metering you need to have the matching body and lenses of the type. (For example, for Mamiya it's SX, and you need the SX body and SX lens. You can put a non-SX body or lens on, but then you are back to stop-down metering.)
Is there something wrong with your Spotmatic that requires servicing? I would just enjoy it for what it is. Clean off the lens, the eyepiece, blow any dust off the mirror and focusing screen. If the lens has yellowed you may need to expose it to a UV lamp or the sun to clear it.
The Fujica ST801 has a large and bright viewfinder. It has a variation of the M42 lens mount. It can accept regular M42 lenses and, with lenses designed for that mount, can also provide open-aperture metering. It also uses a modern battery (PX28).
Fuji made lenses for it and I know that Tamron adapters were made for it as well as Vivitar TX adapters.
Thank you both. I have never handled one, but the specifications for the Fujica ST801 look very attractive on paper.Yes, the ST801.
The Bessaflex TM looks fantastic! For some reason, it was not on my radar. I had heard the name and seen a few photos, but just assumed it it was just another SLR from the 1960s-1970s. I am amazed to learn it was made so recently and to such high standards. But I would have to think twice before paying the current price for a camera with stop-down metering.Without a doubt the M42 camera with the brightest viewfinder is the Bessaflex TM. It is a camera from the 2000s, so new batteries can be used.
The function of the Spotmatic SP is unknown at this time. While dry-firing the shutter and watching the aperture, I do not see any obvious problems, but after 40-50 years wouldn't any foam light seals or mirror bumpers need to be replaced(?) As soon as I get a battery I can test the meter -- then I will shoot a test roll to see what (if anything) needs to be done. And to see how we get along.
I am still researching what UV light source I want to use to try to clear the lens. If clearing up the yellowed lens brightens up the viewfinder enough to really notice, then the Spotmatic might end up being a keeper. It looks and feels like a nicely made camera, and I want to love it. But my memories of using a Spotmatic back in the 1970s are telling me to keep looking.
I cleared my 50mm f1.4 by putting it on a south-facing window sill, tilted upwards, without a filter, and with aluminum foil - shiney side to lens - wrapped over the rear element. I can't recall how long I left it there, but the yellow was gone. But, I live in an area with a great deal of sunlight, and if I recall correctly, it was summer. So, YMMV.
Also, I noticed my shutter speed dial rotates past 1000 to B (and vice versa).
I wish I had a Pentax LX, but what I actually have are a Pentax MX and a KX. But I have decided you are right, and I should just use my K-mount cameras and forget about screw mount.Honestly, if you want a bright screen, open-aperture metering, then just stick with what you have.
If you really wan the m42 experience, give up on one of those goals.
* A Spotmatic-f or ESii will give you the open-aperture metering. Screen is not as bright as your Pentax LX.
* Or, you can get an adapter for your LX so you can use the m42 screwmount lenses. You will have to stop them down to working aperture to meter and shoot.
There are a lot of them. http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/42mm_screw_lensesCan I quickly jump in and ask the m42 experts what's a good choice for a normal screw mount prime? Does not need to be super bright, anything f/1.7-f/2.8 max aperture would do.
Eg any pancakes in the 40/45/50mm range with good IQ?
There are a lot of them. http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/42mm_screw_lenses
One thing to consider is, the quality of the lens coatings improved over time. For example, between 1964 and 1975 Pentax made four versions of the 50mm f1.4 screw mount lens. The first two versions were called "Super-Takumar" -- they were coated, but only the later two were labled "Super-Multi-Coated" or "SMC." Whether the improved coatings are worth seeking out may depend on whether or not you often find yourself shooting under contre-jour lighting conditions. https://petapixel.com/science-of-lens-coatings/
Can I quickly jump in and ask the m42 experts what's a good choice for a normal screw mount prime? Does not need to be super bright, anything f/1.7-f/2.8 max aperture would do.
It occurs to me that m42-mount camera designs are all pre-1975, while the move toward bigger, brighter viewfinders in 35mm SLRs had hardly begun (I suppose with Olympus) by that time. Certainly the K-mount Pentax ME has a great viewfinder, and I'm sure that there are others.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?