• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

where to get times for Jobo B&W development

vedmak

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 12, 2009
Messages
328
Location
Chicago
Format
Analog
Recently got Jobo cpe, but massive dev chart does not have times for Jobo is there a reference for those times? If not what should I start with Rodinal using films like Foma 100, Adox 50, Tmax 100?
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,717
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I carefully followed Jobo's instructions and reduced the development time by 15%. The film came out underdeveloped. After posting here and other forums, I found that a majority of the respondents use the full amount of time and only reduce the processing if and as necessary. This guarentees the the negative will be printable from the start.

Steve
 

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,975
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format

Your advice here is probably sensible, although I have found a need to use shorter development times with Jobo processing. However, direct comparisons are difficult with hand agitation or other methods as the physical procedure of the process varies.


Tom
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,859
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
Recently got Jobo cpe, but massive dev chart does not have times for Jobo is there a reference for those times? If not what should I start with Rodinal using films like Foma 100, Adox 50, Tmax 100?

Local conditions are always different enough to warrant a proper film test. Trial and error takes longer and delivers less accurate results.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,717
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
^^^ What he said ^^^
 

OMU

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
743
Location
Norway
Format
Multi Format
Hi;
I have the same experience.
I have tested dev times for HP5 and FP4 with densitometers and my times are practically the same as the Ilford’s recommendations.
 

Lee L

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
3,282
Format
Multi Format
Here's the most recent word I've seen from Jobo on converting from small tank inversion times, from the Jobo Quarterly, 2nd Quarter, 1998. I think this should fall under 'fair use'.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Lee L

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
3,282
Format
Multi Format
I looked around for the current home of the Jobo Quarterlies. The internet archives for them have moved and occasionally disappeared over the years. They have been at the following location for the last couple of years:

http://www.jobo.com/jobo_service_analog/jq/

which is a menu driven front end to finding articles and issues.

If you have a Jobo, they are well worth reading, and have good stuff for general photo purposes as well.

Lee
 

dng88

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
43
Format
8x10 Format
I am reading Photo Engineer about another reason to do presoak, especially for color, is due to the change in temp. when the dev. solution hit the film. Heating the tube would not work. The water here is 80F+ sometimes. Not yet start my test but would try. Just wonder whether Xtol would need this after all.