Never mind the film add.. the magazine was a pleasure to cruise through.
I quite agree, but life's too short to be commenting on other people's "time wasters"... Which is what I just did too!Life's too short to think about such trivia
I have to be careful, every time I dig up these magazines I spend the rest of the day looking at how to clean a carburetor and make a hutch for a rabbit...
I was thinking maybe by finding ads for film with and without the X, the difference might be revealed...
Page 71 is an ad for Kodak Panatomic film without the X... October 1933
https://books.google.com/books?id=6CcDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA71&dq=kodak+panatomic&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjH9ICl_4HNAhUN4GMKHRZsCHEQ6AEIGzAA#v=onepage&q=kodak panatomic&f=false
Page 225 is an ad mentioning Panatomic-X... February 1939
https://books.google.com/books?id=n...CUU4FBDoAQgiMAI#v=onepage&q=panatomic&f=false
i'm currently looking for the gasoline syphoner-er.
but not sure if lungs full of gas fumes beats a mouth full of fuel !
Maybe Kodak originally planned to call their faster film Super-X but was concerned about trademark infringement.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?