I've never used D76. Do you know how it compares to HC110 or Ilfosol?Think D76. almost identical, but with the components in More than one bag. if all the contents of the envelopes are white and free running, it may very well be good.
I take it that you mean once it is made into a liquid stock solution? In air tight bags I see no reason why ID11 should not last indefinitely or as near to indefinitely as to make no difference.ID11 or D76 is good for about 6 months. I use D76 1:1 or 1:2.
I take it that you mean once it is made into a liquid stock solution? In air tight bags I see no reason why ID11 should not last indefinitely or as near to indefinitely as to make no difference.
Even as stock it should last longer in airtight winebags or in full to the brim 250 or 300ml bottles.
pentaxuser
ID-11 is good for 6-7 months once you've made the stock liquid solution.
In the packets, probably good for many years unless moisture gets into the chemical packets.
ID11 is the only developer I use these days.
10 June 2019
My "go to" developer is D76 (stock). My limited experience with HC110 is that it is much faster working, slightly finer grain, and maybe better acutance. I suspect that the difference between D76/ID-11 and HC110 will be more pronounced in small negatives that large. ID-11 should be good in powder form for many years as long as it is cool and dry. When you mix the stock solution it should be clear and colorless (or slight buff color). If it is cloudy or brown, toss it. As stated above, the stock solution should be good for 3-6 months depending on how much head space is left in the bottle. The fortunate thing is that color is a reasonable indication of activity for both D76 and ID-11.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Darwin
The power of HC-110 comes from the fact that it could be used to give results similar to many other developers, simply by changing the dilution. That is why there are a number of standard dilutions. And its keeping qualities while in syrup form are of course advantageous to labs who use a lot of it.I think it's worth pointing out that the popularity of HC110 is probably due to the fact that Saint Ansel did his development tests that appear in the book The Negative with it. It's a very thick liquid which makes it hard to mix small quantities. I've never noticed any difference between it and D76. Knowing Kodak they probably introduced it because it was cheaper to manufacture than D76.
And its keeping qualities while in syrup form are of course advantageous to labs who use a lot of it.
Actually, I would expect that the intermediate stock instructions were aimed as much at labs that were running a lot of film in either multiple different dilutions, or somewhat smaller tanks.because of the fear that home users would not get the dilution right, the instructions did call for a multi-step process using the entire 16US oz bottle to make an intermediate solution.
different dev times but similar result to Ilfosol;finer grain than HC110.I've never used D76. Do you know how it compares to HC110 or Ilfosol?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?