placed an order for 8x10 film with Freestyle on Friday....what am I to do?
And then always lurking on the new horizon is: 7x17, 8x20, 12x20, 20x24. Should you just buy lenses, tripod and "things", that will work on the 8x10, or should you face the inevitable and buy lens that will cover larger, tripods that will carry heavier? You can always say, “oh I won't go there”. Or, “I am just buying the bigger lens for movement or the bigger tripod to stop movement”. What ever the ploy, be prepared, because they are out there waiting.
A willing victim,
John Powers
Well, you load the film into 8x10 holders, you shoot it, you develop it.... :rolleyes:
So what lenses do you have for 8x10?
The only lens I have that properly covers 8x10 is the 300mm f/8.5 Fujinon-C. I have a modern 210mm f/5.6 Fujinon-W too. It appears to cover straight on and so will probably press that into service from time to time as well. Really want to get a 14 inch Ektar but, that isn't in the cards now.
....what am I to do?
. . .
(5) I really should get an 11x14 worthy of that coverage... yes, why not, the film is actually cheaper per unit area and I can quit enlarging...
. . .
...etc. ad nauseum...
well, the Century studio camera that the former keeper dumped on me came with an unloved Goerz celor...which I'm actually looking forward to shooting.
The only lens I have that properly covers 8x10 is the 300mm f/8.5 Fujinon-C. I have a modern 210mm f/5.6 Fujinon-W too. It appears to cover straight on and so will probably press that into service from time to time as well. Really want to get a 14 inch Ektar but, that isn't in the cards now.
Hopefully, somebody will buy the Speed Graphic I have offered for sale and I can recover from the "eBay Ooops!"...and maybe even afford a bellows eventually
True. The obsession tends to progress along the following cycle, roughly:
(1) I have a very nice 4x5 camera, let me get a lens for it.
(2) Oh here is a lens that covers 8x10... let's buy it...
CHORUS: Oh what a shame to waste all that coverage....
(3) ... so I'll buy an 8x10...
(4) I should get a lens that covers 8x10 well. Wait, here's one that covers 11x14...
REPEAT CHORUS...
(5) I really should get an 11x14 worthy of that coverage... yes, why not, the film is actually cheaper per unit area and I can quit enlarging...
(6) I hear that there are lenses that can cover 20x24....
REPEAT CHORUS...
...etc. ad nauseum...
True. The obsession tends to progress along the following cycle, roughly:
(1) I have a very nice 4x5 camera, let me get a lens for it.
(2) Oh here is a lens that covers 8x10... let's buy it...
CHORUS: Oh what a shame to waste all that coverage....
(3) ... so I'll buy an 8x10...
(4) I should get a lens that covers 8x10 well. Wait, here's one that covers 11x14...
REPEAT CHORUS...
(5) I really should get an 11x14 worthy of that coverage... yes, why not, the film is actually cheaper per unit area and I can quit enlarging...
(6) I hear that there are lenses that can cover 20x24....
REPEAT CHORUS...
...etc. ad nauseum...
True. The obsession tends to progress along the following cycle, roughly:
(1) I have a very nice 4x5 camera, let me get a lens for it.
(2) Oh here is a lens that covers 8x10... let's buy it...
CHORUS: Oh what a shame to waste all that coverage....
(3) ... so I'll buy an 8x10...
(4) I should get a lens that covers 8x10 well. Wait, here's one that covers 11x14...
REPEAT CHORUS...
(5) I really should get an 11x14 worthy of that coverage... yes, why not, the film is actually cheaper per unit area and I can quit enlarging...
(6) I hear that there are lenses that can cover 20x24....
REPEAT CHORUS...
...etc. ad nauseum...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?