Fine art photographers look at the same subject that non-photographers do, and they see more... they see an opportunity to create fine art.
Which occupies them such that they no longer see the rest. The rest, i.e the full experience anyone with an open, not already filled-in approach, gets to enjoy.
So how, "more"?
if you stop to examine what you are about to photograph, then frame and expose the image for what you saw, then your are a photographer.
Why is pre-visualization a requirement?
All the people who I consider 'real' photographers make their living at it. Their commercial work is digital. Most still have a wet darkroom said:I was chatting to a guy on the phone this afternoon who must be a "real" photographer by this criteria. His story was exactly that quoted. He told me he takes so many photo's he ill find himself driving in the country and see a beautiful vista but just not have the spark to stop and get out of his car. He counts the terabytes of data on more than the fingers of one hand and lost a complete terabyte drive recently with no backup.
. . . being a 'real' photographer sounds like living hell to me . . . I think I will stick to being a pretend photographer
No such thing as pre-visualisation. Visualisation is already pre in its implication.
So, then... If I've had three or four beers I'm not allowed to be a photographer anymore? I have to wait until the next morning?
"I'm sorry, I won't be able to take your picture until next Monday."
I disagree. A lot goes on in the mind before we actually see (=visualize) the composition. I routinely imagine compositions long before I see them- [...]
I don't care what they call me, I just enjoy photography.
I was chatting to a guy on the phone this afternoon who must be a "real" photographer by this criteria. His story was exactly that quoted. He told me he takes so many photo's he ill find himself driving in the country and see a beautiful vista but just not have the spark to stop and get out of his car.
"Imagine". As in: form a (mental) image = visualize. "Pre-visualisation" is a tautology.
Actually seeing the thing is not visualizing, but seeing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?