What's the difference? Foma 100, 200, 320 and 400 compared.

Nothing

A
Nothing

  • 1
  • 1
  • 78
Where Did They Go?

A
Where Did They Go?

  • 6
  • 4
  • 195
Red

D
Red

  • 5
  • 3
  • 182
The Big Babinski

A
The Big Babinski

  • 2
  • 6
  • 214

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,038
Messages
2,768,678
Members
99,538
Latest member
Lensgod
Recent bookmarks
1

tim48v

Partner
Joined
Jul 6, 2015
Messages
288
Location
Erie, Colorado
Format
Large Format
Informal comparison of Foma films: Foma 100, 200, 320 and 400 compared

Foma comparasion data.png
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,573
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
What developer did you use? I dont have a densitometry, I use a ringaround to determine my E.I or personal ISO, you seem to get more speed from 400 action than I do and I've used a lot of developers, best I get is 320 with MCM 100, with D76 or HC110 I get 200.
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,806
Format
8x10 Format
Quite different curves from the official ones. All look underdeveloped. And advertised Foma film box speeds are especially unrealistic.
 

albireo

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Messages
1,333
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Informal comparison of Foma films: Foma 100, 200, 320 and 400 compared

Great article. I, too, informally compared a few films, namely TMAX 100, Provia 400, XP2+ and Colorplus. Just like you, I came to the conclusion that, apart from having vastly different exposure density curves, grain structure, spectral response, response to colour or lack thereof, and favourite football team, there isn't really much of a difference!
 

relistan

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
1,571
Location
Dublin, Ireland
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for sharing. The 100 and 400 curves look essentially identical. If developed to same density they would be very close. The 320 looks pretty under developed here so hard to conclude much. The 200 is the clearly different film, which makes sense given that it is a totally different formula from the other two.
 

Ivo Stunga

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
1,176
Location
Latvia
Format
35mm
I've shot a roll or 10 of: 100, R100, 200 and 400, and found 200 to be the best/interesting.

R100 is intended for reversal, clear base - have to bend it to my liking with Ilford Reversal
 

albireo

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Messages
1,333
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
I've shot a roll or 10 of: 100, R100, 200 and 400, and found 200 to be the best/interesting.

Try the 400 in medium or large format exposed as per manufacturer's curves in Excel 1+1. Pretty unique spectral response, really interesting film, quite different from pretty much anything else currently in production.
 

Ivo Stunga

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
1,176
Location
Latvia
Format
35mm
Do you have some examples? I'm 135 slide shooter, so have to ask for examples.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom