What's the difference between Pentax MX and Olympus OM-1?

OP
OP

Markster

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
307
Location
Denver area
Format
35mm
Is the M and L line of Pentax considers a "spotmatic"? I see a Spotmatic group created here on apug... was wondering if it was lumped into that, or a different breed altogether.
 

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,127
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
A couple of corrections:
1. I had mistakenly replied that the MX uses a vertical metal shutter. That is incorrect, it uses a horizontal cloth shutter.
(the ME and ME super use vertival metal shutters)

2. another post mentions the metering of the MX:
"But it is interesting having the pentax's light metering off the film, being able to automatically run many minutes' worth of shutter speed (i.e. night skies, moon, nighttime scenery, etc) and the all-mechanical nature is intriguing."
That is incorrect. The MX meters from the screen. (the Pentax LX meters off the film, as does the Olympus OM1)

Something else to note is that the OM1 has a removable flash shoe. It looks pretty slick without the shoe, but the shoe is breakable or may not come with a camera. Any shoe will work with a manual or non-dedicated flash but to use the Olumpus dedicated flashes you need the proper shoe.

So to summarize, those cameras are very similar in spec. The only major difference is mirror lockup on the OM1.
But in handling, while they look similar and are about the same size, the controls are laid out very differently.

As a system, they both have excellent lenses available and many accessories. In both systems prime lenses beside the basic 28-50-135 are hard to find and are no bargain. But with pentax there are many other branded lenses available, and a M42 adapter as well.
 

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,127
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
Is the M and L line of Pentax considers a "spotmatic"? I see a Spotmatic group created here on apug... was wondering if it was lumped into that, or a different breed altogether.

The spotmatic is a different line entirely. They use the M42 screw mount.
You should be able to find lots of info on them.
 

Ulrich Drolshagen

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Messages
525
Location
Germany
Format
Medium Format
The MX meters from the screen. (the Pentax LX meters off the film, as does the Olympus OM1)
AFAIK in the OM-1 is metering from the screen as well. It can not meter off the film plane as there is the mirror in the way. Off the film real time metering is a feature the OM-2/4 models in aperture priority automatic mode.

Ulrich
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
Ulrich, you are correct. The OM-1 meters off the screen.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,431
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
A couple of minor corrections to darinwc's points about the OM1.

The OM1 doesn't meter off the film. Other cameras in the OM line do.
Most OM1s are actually OM1-MDs - the almost original OM1 is fairly rare, and the truly original M1 is exceptionally rare.

For those three very similar models, the flash shoe you have won't make any difference with dedicated flashes, because the camera doesn't communicate with the flash in any way, other than to trigger it.

If you have a later OM1n, the shoe "4" will communicate with dedicated flashes by lighting a "flash ready" light in the viewfinder. In addition, that light may flicker if the on-flash exposure check system indicates that the auto-flash measured correct flash exposure (I have to check this latter function).
 

BetterSense

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
3,151
Location
North Caroli
Format
35mm
Every OM removeable flash shoe I have ever seen has been cracked. Even if they didn't crack, they sure seem flimsy, being held on with that thumb screw. Whenever I have to use flash with my OM cameras I use a flash bracket.
 

wblynch

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
1,697
Location
Mission Viejo
Format
127 Format
I have only one cracked OM1 shoe. That's because I used to put a Vivitar 283 on there ! (the flash weighs more than the camera). Happily my others are all fine.

But, yeah, you can crack those shoes without trying too hard. -- Advantage MX
 

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,418
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm
Definitely keep an eye out for some very good Takumar/Asahi/Pentax M42 screw mount lenses particularly the SMC (Super Multi Coated) variety as Pentax pioneered this process making vintage lenses viable even today. Besides, I don't believe there is a smaller slr/fisheye then a Takumar 17mm f4 on an MX!

 

Steve Roberts

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2004
Messages
1,298
Location
Near Tavisto
Format
35mm

The MX plus 40mm SMC pancake is a good combination too.

Steve
 
OP
OP

Markster

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
307
Location
Denver area
Format
35mm
Does anybody know if there is an adapter that takes FD lenses (from my existing Canon kit) to K-mount?

Just curious. Saw a post about a M42 lens to FD mout, was wondering if there was a reverse that might go on a Pentax?
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
I don't think they will focus to infinity. The flange to film plane distance is shorter on the FD mount, as I recall.
 

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,127
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
Does anybody know if there is an adapter that takes FD lenses (from my existing Canon kit) to K-mount?

Just curious. Saw a post about a M42 lens to FD mout, was wondering if there was a reverse that might go on a Pentax?

Nope, the FD mount is too short, one of the shortest actually. You cannot mount a FD lens to a pentax and get infinity focus.

However if you want to use one for macro work, you may be able to find a combination of bellows/adapters.
 

KrankyKraut

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
43
Location
Southern Cal
Format
35mm
difference in viewfinder brightness

How does the MX compare to the OM-! in viewfinder brightness? I have read conflicting stories about the MX in this regard.
 

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,418
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm
I am sure different conditions and different screen types can account for a lot of variations. All my MX's and OM's have clean screens and I can't say I can tell much of difference although I favor the slit image screens myself. If nothing else, you can use the Pentax LX screens in the MX - they are interchangeable, and supposedly the LX versions of the same MX screens are a bit brighter.

If you prefer a split image screen then you have to see the K3 screen that originally came with the Nikon FM3A - it never blacks out! Not with slower lenses, or stopped down lenses, extensions or bellows! This can also be used interchangeably with the FA, FE2, FM2, FM and FE. Are there any other split image screens that don't black out?
 

dynachrome

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
1,748
Format
35mm
Pentax MX vs. Olympus OM-1

I think there are more focusing screeens available for the OM-1.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…