What about a Canon?
It does not matter when shooting close in sports photography, no AF lens can focus fast enough.
That's news to me indeed.
I'd repeat an earlier post, "What about a Canon?"
(I'm sure Nikon could raise a flag in this area, too). There is: predictive AF, ServoAF (commonly referred to as "track and trap"), range-limited/indexed servo-AF (BIG Canon L-series telephotos, and they all have extremely snappy AF from near to far). Obviously a very strong point of 35mm with an optic matched to use. For me right now I'm having a ball with lensless landscapes in 6x6, 6x7.
Just keep on using it.
And ask yourself that same question 50 years from now.
Why not try an oversized 35 and go with the Pentax 6x7, works great in fashion when things are always moving and changing fast. I don't think the Blad is especially well suited for this type of shooting and I say that as an owner of 553ELX. A TLR can be good too because your viewing never blacks out but advancing the film fast enough could be an issue. I would never use a Blad just because it is a fad thing to do, I can't think of a more ridiculous reason to use one. Forget the others, do your own thing. Have fun.
You're concerned about what camera is popular with skateboarders? Would you want a skateboard because photographers recommend it?
You're concerned about what camera is popular with skateboarders? Would you want a skateboard because photographers recommend it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?