Sirius Glass
Subscriber
What about a Canon?![]()
It does not matter when shooting close in sports photography, no AF lens can focus fast enough.
By the way, I am a fan of AF lenses on 35mm cameras for things other than what the OP is doing.
Steve
What about a Canon?![]()
It does not matter when shooting close in sports photography, no AF lens can focus fast enough.

That's news to me indeed.
I'd repeat an earlier post, "What about a Canon?"
(I'm sure Nikon could raise a flag in this area, too). There is: predictive AF, ServoAF (commonly referred to as "track and trap"), range-limited/indexed servo-AF (BIG Canon L-series telephotos, and they all have extremely snappy AF from near to far). Obviously a very strong point of 35mm with an optic matched to use. For me right now I'm having a ball with lensless landscapes in 6x6, 6x7.![]()
Just keep on using it.
And ask yourself that same question 50 years from now.
![]()
Why not try an oversized 35 and go with the Pentax 6x7, works great in fashion when things are always moving and changing fast. I don't think the Blad is especially well suited for this type of shooting and I say that as an owner of 553ELX. A TLR can be good too because your viewing never blacks out but advancing the film fast enough could be an issue. I would never use a Blad just because it is a fad thing to do, I can't think of a more ridiculous reason to use one. Forget the others, do your own thing. Have fun.
You're concerned about what camera is popular with skateboarders? Would you want a skateboard because photographers recommend it?
You're concerned about what camera is popular with skateboarders? Would you want a skateboard because photographers recommend it?
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |
