Why do people feel a compelling need to show their photographs? Is it validating or something?
The simple answer is the product of photography is something to look at.
So wanting people to look at it is far from odd, it should be the norm.
Regardless of film or digital...
I print and frame anything I deem worthy of that treatment.
I've also used my digital and film photos to create photobooks for family, such as the one I made for my in-laws after our (them, my wife/kids, and my BIL and his family) big SW Desert trip last summer (was for their 50th anniversary). I also framed a bunch of those photos and currently display them around our house.
Specifically for film, I normally order 4x6 prints, so any worth keeping but not worth enlarging go into the growing stack of mini-albums. I keep all negatives and scans, but only keep prints I like even if they're not worth framing.
Chris
If you like looking at other people's well presented prints, there is a good chance you will like showing your own.
I particularly like participating in group shows with those of my friends who share an interest in photography.
Photography can be a lonely and insular way to occupy your time. Getting out there and showing your work can help you engage with others.
I also like handing around prints with others who have similar interests.
Should? Why should? How many people do you need to look at your work to satisfy this normative requirement? How about friends and family? Is that enough? Or does it need to be a private exhibition like at an old age home? How big an old age home qualifies? Maybe a public exhibition like a coffee shop or a train station? Who decides? Why are they the ones who decide? Who died and made them boss?
Should? Why should? How many people do you need to look at your work to satisfy this normative requirement? How about friends and family? Is that enough? Or does it need to be a private exhibition like at an old age home? How big an old age home qualifies? Maybe a public exhibition like a coffee shop or a train station? Who decides? Why are they the ones who decide? Who died and made them boss?
Photography is a communicative art and craft. There is no point to most of it, if you don't in some way share it.
The way you share it is up to you - there is no particular "should" about what you choose, other than you shouldn't knock it until you have tried it.
I beg to differ. Who are you to say there is no point to my photography if I elect not to share it?
I beg to differ. Who are you to say there is no point to my photography if I elect not to share it?
Don_ih, to whom I was responding, introduced the normative should.
I share my photography with family and friends, and occasionally students and workshop participants. I have displayed my photographs publicly in the past. Been there, done that, got the t-shirt.
It’s clearly true that the end product of photography is visual, as @Don_ih said, but that doesn’t mean you must share it. You may want it just for your own pleasure. Its possible that the majority of photographs are made for that reason, not for sharing but as souvenirs or reminders. Not everyone finds it easy or desirable to post their entire life on social media. The more unusual/deliberate/self-conscious/‘artistic’ the photos, the more momentous that step of sharing becomes. I wouldn’t be surprised if most Photrio contributors experience both desire for appreciation and anxiety that there won’t be any. Think of Vivian Maier, for a classic conflicted case.
While I had shared my photography with family and friends, my other work, my drawings, were never shared. I didn’t feel a need to and, maybe, didn’t want them critiqued. Then, in my mid-60s, I decided to get a BFA, both to challenged my aging brain and to improve my drawing ability, and hadn’t thought through that I’d not only be sharing my work but having it go through formal class critiques. I found the experience worthwhile in many ways and that it allowed me to expand the way I think about my work.
Having the feedback, and challenges, from a very diverse group, diverse in age, cultural backgrounds, sex, and a flurry of genders, was really valuable. Alan mentions getting feedback in a 55+ community and if it’s like the one my mother lives in, the diversity, well, there just isn’t much.
During my senior show critique by faculty, I had a real “Huh?” moment. All the work, drawings, painting, photography, and mosaics, was based around the shape of a circle and I had an evolutionary theme behind it. One of the professors took that work, due to that shape, as feminine and took exception to some of it and attempted to dive deep into the psychological reasons as to why I had chosen to do what I did. Hmmm, well, OK, that’s not what I had in mind but, based on where she as coming from I could see how she saw it that way. That’s one of the great things about art, that interpretation can be personalized.
How do we know Vivien Maier didn't show her work to others? Is that true?
How do we know Vivien Maier didn't show her work to others? Is that true?
Should? Why should? How many people do you need to look at your work to satisfy this normative requirement? How about friends and family? Is that enough? Or does it need to be a private exhibition like at an old age home? How big an old age home qualifies? Maybe a public exhibition like a coffee shop or a train station? Who decides? Why are they the ones who decide? Who died and made them boss?
For the first time, I did a zine from Blurb. The photobook has 48 pictures taken at my grandson's first birthday party. Nice gifting it to my daughter and family.
According to the biography I read, she made some efforts, and was well known as an enthusiastic amateur proud of her work in some of the camera stores she frequented. But her other issues - including compulsive hoarding at the end - meant that her work ended up being far better known after her death.
If not for the web, who would know my "work"? Or anyone's work for that matter, for most of us?Pretty much, yes. I recommend the biography by Ann Marks, ‘Vivian Maier Developed’
I have a public flickr stream and google picture album shared with family and friends that's updated every month. Once a year we print a few albums of the best pictures of that year and sent it to family. When we visit or have visitors I'll print a few 4x6s and mail them after.
I don’t want to usurp the OP’s question, but behind it is the question ‘So why do you do it?’If not for the web, who would know my "work"? Or anyone's work for that matter, for most of us?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?