What was the initial retail cost of Hasselblad 501CM

MarkF48

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
24
Format
Medium Format
A while back I had copied a Hasselblad ad from a 1977 photography magazine I had saved. Some prices back then for new aren't far off from used prices now
 

mike c

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 5, 2009
Messages
2,863
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Multi Format
1977 was a good year for buying a Hasselblad, bought mine in 1978 for $1100, lens, body. back in L.A.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,382
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I have an invoice for a Hasselblad 501cm kit dated 5/10/2000 for £2095.

Welcome to APUG


The prices for Hasselblads had always been high, however when the digital backs were introduced the prices became astronomical.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,382
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
A while back I had copied a Hasselblad ad from a 1977 photography magazine I had saved. Some prices back then for new aren't far off from used prices now View attachment 154193

But in 1977 the dollar was worth more and the salaries were much lower than today.
 

Alan Gales

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
3,253
Location
St. Louis, M
Format
Large Format
Heh -- got an email from B&H yesterday -- they are taking pre-orders on the Hassy H6D 100 Mpixel for a mere $32,995 -- still not targeted at the amateur market.

I remember back in the 80's when a Hasselblad 500/cm with waist level finder, film back and 80mm lens cost $2,000. You could have bought a half way decent cheap used car for that. For $32,998 you can buy a nice new car!
 

Neil Poulsen

Member
Joined
May 28, 2005
Messages
520
Format
4x5 Format
Old joke . . .

In determining price, Hasselblad conducted a market study to determine the most that anyone would want to pay for a camera. Then, they doubled it.
 

RobC

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
3,880
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
I remember back in the 80's when a Hasselblad 500/cm with waist level finder, film back and 80mm lens cost $2,000. You could have bought a half way decent cheap used car for that. For $32,998 you can buy a nice new car!
And it probably wouldn't have jammed with regular monotony either.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,382
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
And it probably wouldn't have jammed with regular monotony either.

Only in the hands of awkward aofs. Jes' sayin'
 

RobC

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
3,880
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
No, a new hasselbald is like campagnolo compared to shimano. The campagnolo wears in from new whereas the shimano wears out from new.
If you've never owned a brand new hasselblad you wouldn't know about that. I've owned three new ones and all three have had jamming problems when new until they loosened up a little.
 
Last edited:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,063
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
It makes sense that the digital back Hasselblads cost as much as they do.

Think how much the film Hasselblads would have cost you if you had to buy at the same time all the film you were going to put through them during their life!
 

RobC

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
3,880
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
the only good bit about a hasselblad is the lens which isn't made by hassleblad.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,382
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
It makes sense that the digital back Hasselblads cost as much as they do.

Think how much the film Hasselblads would have cost you if you had to buy at the same time all the film you were going to put through them during their life!

Film cost is not a major concern of mine.
 
OP
OP

ted_smith

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
493
Location
uk
Format
Multi Format
bought mine in 1978 for $1100, lens, body. back in L.A.

That kind of puts things into perspective. In 1978, $1100 dollars is about $4K by todays money (http://www.dollartimes.com/inflation/inflation.php?amount=1100&year=1978). And the exchnage rate then was
$1.9 to £1 (https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/EXUSUK.txt). So, in 1978, is it fair to say that a new V-system Blad was about £2K?

Now by todays standards that doesn't seem amazingly high when Nikon D5's cost about £4K, as did the D4 before it, and as did the D3 before that. But when you consider the average annual wage in 1978 was $10K per annum in the USA and £6K in the UK.

When you look at it that way, if £6K per year was the average (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...incomes-have-risen-and-fallen-since-1948.html) and Blads cost £2K, that's 1/3 of annual income. Today, the national average in the UK is £26,500 per year. V-System blads still cost about £2K (generally less) yet H system Blads cost £30K!! More than an average annual income.

None of this is relevant, but interesting I think.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,063
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Film cost is not a major concern of mine.
It would be if you were only given one chance to buy it, for use during the camera's full life, and that was at the time you bought the camera.
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,656
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
UK prices have always been a rip off.UK consumers are too polite and too civilized for a violent revolt.Unfortunately.
 

paul ron

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
2,706
Location
NYC
Format
Medium Format
the only way to get a hassy to stop jamming is to throw it away!

hahahaha

everyone has their favorites. lets just shoot alot of film so they keep making it for us!

we're all passengers on the titanic... doesnt matter where you're sitting.


.
 

paul ron

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
2,706
Location
NYC
Format
Medium Format
A while back I had copied a Hasselblad ad from a 1977 photography magazine I had saved. Some prices back then for new aren't far off from used prices now View attachment 154193

wow. amazing how cheap we can get all this today... thank you digital!
 

megzdad81

Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2009
Messages
155
Location
Knoxville, T
Format
8x10 Format
I don't know what they cost then, but I just got a NIB haze filter from KEH that was marked $249! Everything is relative ...
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,063
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
100 Mpixels - not quite enough for a 24" x 30" print at 400 dpi.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
Maybe I'm just extraordinarily lucky. I've been using Hasselblads for over 20 years, I have four of them plus numerous lenses, and I've never had a single jam or malfunction of any kind.
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,213
Location
Hawaii
Format
35mm RF
As I heard from a Good Old Days Surf Photographer (I think Jeff Divine)
"we used to make thousands using lenses that cost us hundreds; now we make hundreds using lenses that cost thousands".
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,452
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
UK prices have always been a rip off.UK consumers are too polite and too civilized for a violent revolt.Unfortunately.

The issue is, in part, the addition of VAT in European countries. In 1981 I travelled to Britain for the first time, and my Olympus OM-1MD jammed! I inquired to locals about where to purchase a replacement camera, and I was referred to a Comet store. There I purchased a brand new OM-1n body, and after the VAT was refunded to me, the OM-1n body cost me US$110 net, a small fraction of the price back at home in the U.S. (in the years before NYC mail order prices set the standard for low prices)
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…