Snapper said:What brands are the best value that should I look out for and which ones should I avoid, what features should I be looking for? What kind of prices should I be paying?
Snapper said:Can anyone give any recommendations & tips for buying a s/h 5x4? I'm looking for something relatively inexpensive for people new to LF to try out that does the basics well. What brands are the best value that should I look out for and which ones should I avoid, what features should I be looking for? What kind of prices should I be paying?
For example, I saw an Arca Swiss 5x4 go on ebay this morning for £125 ($225 USD). Is this a good camera/price?
mrcallow said:This may be off topic but...
The Arca Swiss (I am told) is a good Camera and the price sounds very good.
Sinar F1's can be had for a very reasonable price and are very good. The Sinar has a ton of easily found accessories and, when the time comes, it can be upgraded to the F2 relatively cheaply.
Back to the topic...
Jorge you are relentless...
and correct.
glbeas said:Actually the cheapest way I know is how I was intro'd, an old Crown Graphic. Portable, enough movements to make some use of and they usually come with a fairly decent lens. A working rangefinder is a real plus too. I've seen complete kits go fairly reasonable on Ebay.
Snapper,raucousimages said:#1
Contact a local camera club, introduce yourself and tell them you need info on LF cameras offer to purchase a couple boxes of film and dinner to go with some of the LF shooters and spend time learning the pros and cons of there cameras.
#2
My choice would be a toyo rail camera as a first LF.
A. Cheap
B. Toyo is good with parts /service.
C. Easy to resell if you move up to beter rail or field camera.
D. Great in studio.
E. Good in field, remove rail and wrap camera in darkcloth. easy to
backpack.
#3
I have several LF cameras but my favorite is a toyo 45 AII.
#4
The rest of you grow up or take it outside. What the hell does this have to do with choosing a first LF camera? I love traditional photography and LF. I want to help more poeple git into it not let them see what asses we can be.
On folding cameras, the rear/back movements add a lot more hardware to the mix... Rather than a hinge that the rear standard attaches to the bed, it becomes a different system. To keep weight and costs lower, so models have less movements for the rear standard.I've read some of the articles and I've narrowed it down a bit now - the camera would be used for landscape, interiors and portraiture, but not architecture. What does this mean for the range of movements - just what is Rear Rise and Back Shift - these tend to be the ones left out by a lot of cameras.
For landscape, portraiture and interiors you won't need what the other cameras can do... You'll be fine. The biggest consideration you may want to look into are a bag bellows and how short of a lens can you use. If you're doing interiors, you're likely to want wide angle capabilities... Recessed lensboards, being able to put a bag bellows on, minimum extention... These are all things that will be affected.I quite like the idea of the folding cameras if it's going to be used for landscape - but what do you sacrifice for the weight and portability in terms of functionality?
Film holders for 4x5 and 8x10 at least are universal... Standard film holders will all work.I also need something that it is quite easy to get bits and peices for cheap s/h on ebay, such as film holders.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?