What to do with "offensive" artworks?

Frank Dean,  Blacksmith

A
Frank Dean, Blacksmith

  • 8
  • 5
  • 73
Woman wearing shades.

Woman wearing shades.

  • 1
  • 1
  • 80
Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 6
  • 0
  • 92
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 10
  • 1
  • 115
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 5
  • 1
  • 86

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,842
Messages
2,781,733
Members
99,725
Latest member
saint_otrott
Recent bookmarks
0

BruceN

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2004
Messages
585
Location
Wyoming
Format
Multi Format
mrcallow said:
Bruce,
You may be correct, but trained artists generally have a pretty thorough history background.
Perhaps, but the odds of a Southern California artist of that era being well versed in local Idaho lore still seem a bit long to me...

The historical importance may not be that the event happened as depicted, but that what was depicted was allowed -- or chosen -- to be painted on the courthouse walls.
Touché.


An out of work artist is a bit of a redundancy :wink:
:wink:
 

anyte

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
701
Location
Minnesota
Format
35mm
The murals were painted in California and then moved to the court house. I believe they have value, but I don't think the court house is the appropriate place for them. Not because some people will find it offensive, but because they won't get the recognition that they may deserve there. I think it would be best to move them to a museum where those who can appreciate art and history will do so, and those who are offended can run along without stopping for closer examination.

Everyone is offended by something and there is no way to ensure that all people are equally satisfied to the last degree. All we can do is compromise. Some people won't be happy if the murals are moved, and some people won't be happy if they stay. Moving them makes more sense as the murals could be better preserved in a museum than in a court house.
 

lkorell

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Messages
37
Location
Agua Dulce,
Format
Multi Format
When any artwork is commissioned as a part of a structure, it does not get any special treatment if the structure is modified or removed. If it was a set of paintings it would be easy to move them to another location for viewing, but in the case of a mural on a public building, it is not art as much as it is decoration. So if the decor changes, so does the artwork. C'est la vie.
I don't think it is a question of offensive or not. If it is practical to remodel the structure, then the changes could necessitate the removal of the mural no matter what the content. Some people however will use the content as a political tool to make a statement regardless.

Lou
 

unregistered

Member
Joined
May 4, 2006
Messages
290
Format
Multi Format
Actually keeping the murals up might remind society of the horrific acts done to others in the past and help to guide them not to do it again in the future. Since history has a way of repeating itself, having a constant reminder might just help stop it from happening again.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom