E. von Hoegh
Member
in another thread an image was posted to show a developer and film "worked" it was suggested
that it should have full contrast ( blacks and whites ) because this " isnt victorian england" ....
why does this even matter ?
its like suggesting all color photographs have to have the vivid color pallet as velvia or grain like tri x or autochromes. ....
or they are terrible / not real photographs.
this isnt a what is art post, or a photograph just has to be made with light sensitive material
and chemical rays of light ( which excludes digital image making ).
over the years i have heard wacky studff like color photographs arent real photographs, or if something isnt a portrait it isnt a photograph...
do you have any biases or prejudices about what a photograph is or isnt ?
A photograph is a drawing, light is the pencil.