I've standardized all my jpegs to be between 1200-1500px in the long dimension and saved with a jpeg quality setting between 8-10. Retina screens are between 150-400dpi so images saved at that size won't look terrible if someone is using newer stuff, and sites will feed a lower res file to people with lower res screens/browsers. Wait, 1500px? someone can steal my pictures!? If someone wants to make 150dpi 10 inch print from it then they can have at it.
you may be surprised how good an 8x10 can look at that resolution or even less, have you tried printing one? I post at 700px long and watermark.
I think most people have 1920x1080 for their desktop and 1336x800 for laptop. So size the picture for those.
I think most people have 1920x1080 for their desktop and 1336x800 for laptop. So size the picture for those.
I export everything at 1024 long edge and 300dpi.
be careful with thinking to know what MOSTpeople have or do;most people aren't most people and none of them areYou I
Agree! I have no monitor either desktop or laptop of those resolutions but that's my guess. Since I can not tally the monitors of all the people and I don't know what their resolution are then I or you can't know what size the image should be.
The relative size of the image on a screen is based on resolution - the number of pixels you select to download such as 1200 x 900 pixels. Selecting 72 dpi or for that matter 300 dpi (for printing) has no bearing on what size shows up on the monitor. It's pixel resolution that counts. For example, if your monitor displays 2400 pixels wide, then the 1200 x 900 pixel image will take up one-half the width of your monitor screen. If your monitor is 3600 pixels wide, then the image will be one-third the width. If someone is using a monitor that displays 1200 pixels wide, then the image will fill the whole width of the screen.72 dpi, save for web and not very big
The relative size of the image on a screen is based on resolution - the number of pixels you select to download such as 1200 x 900 pixels. Selecting 72 dpi or for that matter 300 dpi (for printing) has no bearing on what size shows up on the monitor. It's pixel resolution that counts. For example, if your monitor displays 2400 pixels wide, then the 1200 x 900 pixel image will take up one-half the width of your monitor screen. If your monitor is 3600 pixels wide, then the image will be one-third the width. If someone is using a monitor that displays 1200 pixels wide, then the image will fill the whole width of the screen.
Now some sites up-rez or down-rez the images to give apparent increases or decreases to the actual size of the image's true resolution. But that's the server's capability.
the question n the title was about resolution but, the discussion drifted into image size. It's an old thread.so, I don't know if still relevant but, the best image resolution for the web is still 72dpi.Getting back into photo after being away for several years...
I'm not sure what size to make images for web display. Seems like several important things have changed- monitors are bigger, display cards produce all kinds of different resolutions, and browsers now seem to (mostly?) auto-size (not sure).
So, what is the current standard for size on images meant for web display? Considerations?
Back-in-the-day I used to limit my height to about 600 pixels since many users were using 800x600, and in fact some of the Internet forums I use still use approx that as a size limit (I assume to limit storage requirements as well as for compatibility with legacy software).
Thanks,
Keith Ostertag
The actual picture size in pixels is what is important. Talking about dpi without specifying the size of the image in inches is meaningless.the question n the title was about resolution but, the discussion drifted into image size. It's an old thread.so, I don't know if still relevant but, the best image resolution for the web is still 72dpi.
So true. For web stuff I usually set the longest side to 1024px. But the original question by the OP was about resolution. Maybe they don't understand the relationship or lack thereof.The actual picture size in pixels is what is important. Talking about dpi without specifying the size of the image in inches is meaningless.
It's been misunderstood since the early days of digital imaging... sighMaybe they don't understand the relationship or lack thereof.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?