Yeah that's why I thought something to go with the Nikon 10-20mm might be a good choice, it's a cheap way to get a digital ultra-wide.My friend has been house shopping for a few years; I've seen hundreds of interior and exterior photos. In 35mm equivalent terms, the photos all look like they've been shot with 16mm to 24mm lenses. Really wide!
... As an aside, all us agents have seen the super ultra wide angle room shots and the universal consensus is thumbs down. Totally misrepresents the size of the room, making the listing agent look like he's a scumbucket. The buyer's agent sends an MLS link to the buyer, then upon actual showing, what looked like a sizeable room was actually a telephone booth. Dirty pool.
Well if you want a normalish perspective, the DX/APS-C equivalent of 28mm is between 18-19mm, and a lot of Nikon's standard DX zooms started at 18mm, so there's a ton of cheap lenses available in that range. With something a bit older like a D90 or a cheapish D7000, and the 18-55mm you could get out for <$300. This isn't pro tough gear, but it doesn't sound like that's what you're after here.Yes all my Nikon stuff is either F or F2. I have lenses starting at 28mm on up, but they're all non-AI. As an aside, all us agents have seen the super ultra wide angle room shots and the universal consensus is thumbs down. Totally misrepresents the size of the room, making the listing agent look like he's a scumbucket. The buyer's agent sends an MLS link to the buyer, then upon actual showing, what looked like a sizeable room was actually a telephone booth. Dirty pool.
Even with a 7000, you could probably do the HDR in "post".Now for a tougher question. Say I did get a 7000. Our pro photographer uses a really expensive high end Nikon and a fancy flash. He shoots a half dozen shots from his tripod, and somehow stacks the layers. A poorly lit room ends up looking like he brought in a van load of fancy lighting equipment. Somehow I don't think I could do that with any of these used cameras.
Awesome! And you're right. Those wide angle converters will diminish the picture quality, however, if you're going to be posting them online at a highly compressed 72 dpi and not making large prints for printed advertisements, then no one will know. And even if they are being printed, chances are no one will really know because this typically isn't the type of photo people scrutinize for quality, but rather just stare at it an try to imagine where their furniture will go and how jealous their friends will be. As long as the lighting is good and the house is staged to look inviting, that's all that really matters.Well the D7100 came today, with its 18-55 lens, for which iI thank you guys for steering me right. I wasn't entirely happy that the 18mm was going to be enough for the kind of real estate interior shots I need. But it also came with a few accessories, one of which was a screw-on wide angle adapter called "Digital Concepts High Definition 0.43X 52mm wide angle lens". And when I screw that on the front of the lens and set the lens zoom at 18mm, it vignettes the image at the corners. So when I set the lens to about 21mm, the vignetting goes away and I end up with a good bit wider angle lens than without the adapter. I realize that screw-on adapters compromise picture quality just as bad or worse than teleconverters, but the MLS photo quality is so poor that I don't think it's going to matter one bit. MLS is the realtor website that agents pay for to post our listings. So all things considered, I believe if I had the latest D-850 and best lenses, I couldn't have done better. The 7100 can shoot 5 shots for stacking layers for contrast control, so it seems you guys put me right where I needed to be. Thank you.
Or alternatively, you use a hotshoe mounted bubble level - something like this:Which brings to mind, you may want to make sure your tripod that has a bubble level on the head to make sure the camera is level so you don't get perspective distortion.
Thank you all. I believe you folks have got me fixed up on the camera and lens part. Now for a flash that can let me do those stacked photos of rooms that look like I used fancy lighting equipment. r will that cost a pretty penny? I'm spending the boss' money and am a frugal sort.
some of the intro-level DSLR Nikons come with a 17-35mm kit lens, which is excellent;that would be hust right for you!My first and hopefully only post in the digital categories. But I haven't a clue as to which digital camera I need. I'm a realtor and need to take interior and exterior house photos. If I were speaking in 35mm film terms, I suppose I would need something in the 28-35mm lens range. I do not know what that translates to in the digital world. And I'll also be needing an affordable digital Nikon SLR, used, of some kind. I don't want the photos to be of crap quality, but certainly don't need a D-850. Digital photography is just not something I want to sink a pile of money into. Thank you.
you can^^Can't I just manually shoot 5 frames spaced an f/stop apart and drag them into my editing program and stack them there, and forget about doing it in-camera?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?