I picked up a parts body for almost nothing that turned out to be completely fine. I just shot with it for the first time today, and the focusing screen has a diagonal micro-prism in it. This is genius!
I hate micro-prisms because I hate having to hunt for a horizontal line, and the point of focus does not always have a horizontal line. Why aren't all micro-prisms diagonal?
Now almost any line will do! I wish my FE and FM had this.
EDIT: Are these center focusing spots microprisms or split image rangefinders? Is there a difference...?
So the answer to the OP's question which I am not sure we have managed to do yet, That question being: Why aren't all split image finders diagonal, is that in the real world there is no more of a chance that a scene will have diagonal line in it than horizontal or vertical?'
I prefer microprism centers over split image centers, simply for the reason that in the real world the subject may have zero horizontal or vertical lines to align...a 'simmering' eye in a portrait is much more useful, IMHO.
...in the real world there is no more of a chance that a scene will have diagonal line in it than horizontal or vertical?
pentaxuser
Thanks Ariston. While I have never had a camera with either a microprism or a split image finder I think you may be right and that the diagonal split does indeed square the circle and my question was not an indirect challenge to you but was an attempt to get an answer to what seemed to be a good question of "Why aren't all splits diagonal? "The reason I said the diagonal split is genius is because it works on horizontal AND vertical lines, either of which will intersect a diagonal line. . You have to try it!
Hi Pentaxuser, I was not offended and did not think you were being argumentative at all - I hope my post didn't make it seem that way. I had never tried a diagonal one (I didn't know they existed), and it never occurred to me how much easier it is when you can engage vertical OR horizontal lines. I had actually been looking to get Type B screens for all my Nikons because I found the horizontal split so useless and cluttering... but it turns out I actually don't mind the split so much if it is as useful as the diagonal one is.Thanks Ariston. While I have never had a camera with either a microprism or a split image finder I think you may be right and that the diagonal split does indeed square the circle and my question was not an indirect challenge to you but was an attempt to get an answer to what seemed to be a good question of "Why aren't all splits diagonal? "
Everyone who asks questions here deserves answer which answer the question or say simply that they have no direct answer to "why not?" It is that aspect at which we are not very good at times
pentaxuser
I had actually been looking to get Type B screens for all my Nikons because I found the horizontal split so useless and cluttering... but it turns out I actually don't mind the split so much if it is as useful as the diagonal one is.
When I first started using Nikon SLRs, the body usually came with a Type A view screen with a horizontal split-image rangefinder focusing aid. I replaced those Type A screens with the Type B screens. However, as I aged and my eyesight deteriorated, I could no longer focus accurately with Type B. I ended up going back to Type A screens.
Thanks Ariston. While I have never had a camera with either a microprism or a split image finder I think you may be right and that the diagonal split does indeed square the circle and my question was not an indirect challenge to you but was an attempt to get an answer to what seemed to be a good question of "Why aren't all splits diagonal? "
Everyone who asks questions here deserves answer which answer the question or say simply that they have no direct answer to "why not?" It is that aspect at which we are not very good at times
pentaxuser
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?