I think tmax 400 and 100 act very differently in their results if you change only the exposure for a given scene and use the same developer, camera, lens, etc... Something about the curves, color sensitivity, contrast... They are different films that share the tmax name and Kodak high quality. 100 seems a little flatter, suitable for copy work but can also be made super contrasty as a substitute for tech pan. Both are quite versatile for various uses.
100 use can use caffenol-C without fogging. There are caffenol variants that can be used with higher speed films though.
In large format, I think (not speaking with certainty), Tmx has a uv blocking layer and tmy2 doesn't, and this is useful for alt process printing which require uv or sunlight to happen.
Few need the higher detail of tmx in LF (or MF for that matter). I am pleased with the fine grain of tmy2 and use that for just about everything in MF and LF.