What kodak should have done was not sell their digital patents and created the digital revolution, calling the name Digak or something, meanwhile moving their "Kodak" film brand to a small facility way ahead of ilford doing so, and kept that company as a separate small profitable film maker back in 2001 when the drop off happened using some of the insane profits the year before.
This would have solidified their position and been a very "pound wise" strategy.
They did not....
Let's move on to now... And what they should do now... Or actually let's not, just think about it.
Back to the OP, yes kodak is probably your best non-slide film, and I'm assuming, since the OP was normally shooting slide film, he is probably scanning, and therefore my suggestion actually would be for one of the Portra line, I can't tell you why, but I have an absolutely horrible time scanning ektar100, when I have the lab do it it comes up beautifully, so I know that the actual images are good, but something about my scanner just doesn't like that film, and I'm not technically savvy enough to understand how to fix the problem, while side-by-side transparencies show me that the film is actually exposed properly and that it something to do with my scanner and it's Settings that I'm failing at. Obviously the OPD might have better skills that I am that department, and that's about the most I'll comment on that particular aspect as I know that is forbidden here
Good luck OP!