What is a good diffusor enlarger for medium format

Shaggysk8 · May 20, 2009

Hello, as the title says really, I will not be getting one yet, but have no idea what is good or bad and tips and pointers in the right direction would be a great help for me.

Kind Regards
Paul

Dan Henderson · May 20, 2009

I am sure you will get many opinions, but I like my old Omega D2 fitted with a new Aristo cold light. It is a rock solid enlarger, and there is something intrinsically rewarding about using something that is about as old as I am.

Jeff L · May 20, 2009

There are many good enlargers and they're nearly all free now. LPL, Omega, Beseler. I have an LPL that's Rollei branded and it works perfectly for me. Make sure before you purchase that you can find the neg carriers that you'll need. You may find good free stuff on Craigslist or Freecycle.

L Gebhardt · May 20, 2009

I would go with a color head if you want a diffusor and might eventually do color. Not sure what is common where you are, but all the major brands are at least very good. I have a couple of Omega D5s. Not the best (from comments I've seen), but I can easily get parts and the price was right. I have an Ilford multigrade head on one of my D5s and it is a great setup for black and white. They are also relatively common, but I do worry about service in the future. The Chromega head is very simple and mechanical, so I figure I can always fix it.

jeffreyg · May 20, 2009

I use an Omega D2 with an Aristo VCL4500 (4x5) variable contrast cold light. I only print B&W and this lets you control the contrast on multigrade papers without filters. You can expose different areas of an image at different contrasts. It is very versatile but not cheap.

RalphLambrecht · May 20, 2009

2nd vote for a color enlarger, even if you never intend to do color. They are good diffusion enlargers and have the filters for VC printing built right in. I'm not a fan of cold-light heads, which are very popular in the US. Their light consistency issues drove me up a tree. I prefer constant light output at all times, without having to worry about warm up. There are better ways to get perfect diffusion than cold light. Also, condenser enlargers have an unwarranted bad reputation. They are just as good as diffusion if the negative contrast is adjusted accordingly.

I'm sure cold-light owners will protest. It's just my experience and humble opinion.

r-brian · May 20, 2009

I have a Beseler 23CII with a color head. It will do up to 6x9. Easy to use, just dial in the filtration for the contrast settings. I also have an old Omega DII that was made between 1947 and 1952. It does up to 4x5. Having a diffusion enlarger and a condenser enlarger allows me to choose which one is best for which negative.

Ian Grant · May 20, 2009

Virtually all the suggestions are for enlargers that are quite rare in the UK, apart from LPL. The best choice is a Durst M600 series, these were the most common enlargers, an M670 is a good choice, and as others have said you need a colour head as that's a diffuser anyway. Be aware that not all MF enlargers will take 6x7 so if you wish to print that format you need to ensure that you buy a model that does.

Ian

Martin Aislabie · May 20, 2009

Paul, there are very few bad enlargers in MF, so anything made in the past 30 years that has been looked after will be good

As Ian Grant points out, Durst were the most common manufacturer in the UK and still have a good service and support vendor - http://www.northernphoto.co.uk/

The Meopta Magnifax 4 was also both well regarded and good value for money.

Enlargers are simple devices, so there is little to go wrong unless they have been misused or dropped

As well as EBAY, NOVA (http://www.novadarkroom.com/cat/203/Enlargers.html) and Second Hand Darkrooms (http://www.secondhanddarkroom.co.uk/www.secondhanddarkroom.co.uk/info.php?p=3) are always worth a look.

If you get a Colour Head its very important to make sure it comes with a working stabilised transformer

It’s also worth investing in a good Enlarging Lens

Good luck

Martin

Peter Schrager · May 20, 2009

enlarger

just picked up an older minolta color enlarger....after using a beseler 4x5 with a cold lite all these years I'm amazed at the quality of the prints from this little machine...if you can find one buy it..make sure it is working and get the lensboards with it or you are in trouble
Best, Peter

jp80874 · May 20, 2009

When I graduated from 35mm the man who sold me my 6cm x 7cm Mamiya RZ gave me advice that has proved good. He said most who use MF eventually try 4x5. In today's market there is little difference in price between a good MF and a good 4x5 enlarger. I have an LPL 4550XLG/VCCE that works very well. I have since moved up to 8x10 and I can also highly recommend a Durst. I also use the variable contrast light to make contact prints from the 7x17 pictured in my avatar. In life like chess it pays to plan beyond your next move.

John Powers

Shaggysk8 · May 21, 2009

Thank you everyone I will take on board everything everyone has said and do some investigating to see what I can find myself

Martin Aislabie · May 22, 2009

jp80874 said:
In today's market there is little difference in price between a good MF and a good 4x5 enlarger.
John Powers

Not in the UK

A decent MF Enlarger is only about half the price of a decent 5x4 Enlarger.

Martin

richard littlewood · May 24, 2009

Dont overlook a condensor enlarger though. There are often older 5x4 Devere condensor enlargers on e-bay, and others. If they have neg carriers youre away. All they need usually is a good scrub up. An old Devere, with shiney condensor lenses will give a fantastic light, and will do if you fancy 5x4.

RalphLambrecht · May 24, 2009

Shaggysk8 said:
Hello, as the title says really, I will not be getting one yet, but have no idea what is good or bad and tips and pointers in the right direction would be a great help for me.

Kind Regards
Paul

Yes, why not a condenser?

Ian Grant · May 25, 2009

RalphLambrecht said:
Yes, why not a condenser?

We could equally ask why a condenser enlarger. I've used both and much prefer a diffuser enlarger but the higher contrast & brightness of a condenser can be useful with large enlargements, typically over a metre in width and upwards.

Ian

richard littlewood · May 25, 2009

As Ian said it is all down to taste. Good thing about a condensor is if the grain and spotting out become too much, it is easy to diffuse the light near the neg with some opaque persex or the like.

thefizz · May 28, 2009

I have a Fujimoto G70 colour enlarger which caters for 35mm to 6x7 and has a built in timer and a very high column for big enlargements.

The best thing about this enlarger is the reversible light source which can switch between condensor and diffuser. Best of both worlds

The following site has one of the later version (VR70) for sale:
Dead Link Removed

Shaggysk8 · May 28, 2009

I like the look of that, now is that one use colour filters or is it built in (I don't know a lot about enlargers so please excuse my ignorance)

thefizz · May 28, 2009

Yes it has the three colour filters. The dials are on the right hand side.

Shaggysk8 · May 28, 2009

I found this on ebay, I think I might need to get it, what do people think?, I have a bronica ETRS and a 35 plus I will go large format at a later date.

What is a good diffusor enlarger for medium format

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency