There is a difference between a selfie, a self portrait and using oneself to create an image (I don't think anyone would call Cindy Sherman's pictures "selfies").
The endless stream of pictures showing a person in front of different things are typical selfies and of little or, to be honest, mostly, of no interest.
A self portrait usually require some thinking and conveys something more than "I was there" if it is to be considered successful.
What's the point of shooting photographs of your vacation if you don't include some of the landmarks of the places you visited, including yourself and family? I'm referring to shots other than artsy ones.
I never bothered being in a picture before a historical site or some sort of attraction to prove "I was there"...
I love the smell irony in the morning.
It smells like .................. victory
Members of photography forum scorn people on vacation for taking pictures during their vacation
What's the point of shooting photographs of your vacation if you don't include some of the landmarks of the places you visited, including yourself and family? I'm referring to shots other than artsy ones.
I think there may be more of a demarcation in your thoughts than some other might with respect to the perception of different types of photography.
I think I'm a bit different - I tend to perceive how much artistry is employed in photography, not whether or not there is any.
Back when I was helping lots of different people with their photography I wouldn't tell them to stop taking record shots of their trips or adventures or social situations. Instead we would concentrate on how to improve the qualities of and interesting nature of those photos - in other words increasing the amount of artistry imbued in them.
Photographically speaking, the problem with most travel shots is how artless they are, not that they are taken.
I make it a point of determining before I travel whether the trip is to take photos or to take a vacation. When it is for the latter, I will usually just take a small digital camera, and pretty much let my wife take the vacation photos. It can be quite liberating.
In the end, I ended up not scorning as much as I could. I’m gonna tell a nice story about my latest trip. I went to the Chamonix-Mt. Blanc valley, in France, close to the border with Switzerland.I love the smell irony in the morning.
It smells like .................. victory
Members of photography forum scorn people on vacation for taking pictures during their vacation
Why should it be ironic? Not all photographers gravitate towards all forms of photography.
1. I play football, but i am not much of a baseball player and do not really follow the sport.
2. I play football.
I went to our local track to do some jogging, and every Mom and Dad was there with every kid.
It was so crowded i could hardly even walk a lap, much less jog a lap.
These families are not even serious runners. Why don't they simply stay home so us Real Athletes can do what we need to do
I am not sure if I get your point here................................
So YES, of course it is ironic that members of a photo forum would be bitching about all the people taking pictures
I remember a time when telling friends “I was there” was enough for them to believe you. And they were much more interested in seeing what you saw, instead of seeing you there. Crazy times.
Why not? I bitch about a lot of stuff all the time.
The only thing that is almost unarguably worse today, is the larger society's lack of decorum, politeness, and mannered behaviour which is really what underlies the obnoxious habits noted in this thread...
I bitch about a lot of stuff all the time.
Mostly everyone does. Some don’t recognize it, though.
I think there may be more of a demarcation in your thoughts than some other might with respect to the perception of different types of photography.
I think I'm a bit different - I tend to perceive how much artistry is employed in photography, not whether or not there is any.
Back when I was helping lots of different people with their photography I wouldn't tell them to stop taking record shots of their trips or adventures or social situations. Instead we would concentrate on how to improve the qualities of and interesting nature of those photos - in other words increasing the amount of artistry imbued in them.
Photographically speaking, the problem with most travel shots is how artless they are, not that they are taken.
Mostly everyone does. Some don’t recognize it, though.
It's not mainly that they're artless. It's that there are too many of them and often multiple pictures of the same thing. How many photos of the Eiffel Tower do I need to look at before I want to kill the photographer?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?