First of all, if this is not the right place to post this, please feel free to move it. I have no idea where to put this.
We just watched a great B&W Jimmy Stewart movie called "Call Northside 777" that was made in 1948. It showed a photograph being loaded onto some sort of rotating cylinder that was transmitted by telephone wires to another newspaper location. Apparently, they still had to develop it on the other end, because the guy had said that it wouldn't take long to get the print because it was a positive.
Does anyone know what process this was? It looked fascinating, especially the shot of the darkroom, where lo and behold hung what looked like a perfect copy of my old Kodak bullet safe light. Everything about the photographic process up to that point made sense to me, except for the guy in the darkroom who had a visor (safe light glare? LOL), and some sort of protective sleeves on his shirt that I would love to have myself to keep chemicals off my arms. The whole process almost looked like some form of early scanning, sorta.
My wife was asking me "you actually recognize those things in their darkroom"? I almost hated to tell her that some of the stuff in my darkroom and two of my cameras are older than 1948. Boy, that will make you feel old. By the way, the guy that was imprisoned, whom Jimmy Stewart was trying to exonerate by means of that photo, was found.....sorry, you'll have to watch the film for that part.
We just watched a great B&W Jimmy Stewart movie called "Call Northside 777" that was made in 1948. It showed a photograph being loaded onto some sort of rotating cylinder that was transmitted by telephone wires to another newspaper location. Apparently, they still had to develop it on the other end, because the guy had said that it wouldn't take long to get the print because it was a positive.
Does anyone know what process this was? It looked fascinating, especially the shot of the darkroom, where lo and behold hung what looked like a perfect copy of my old Kodak bullet safe light. Everything about the photographic process up to that point made sense to me, except for the guy in the darkroom who had a visor (safe light glare? LOL), and some sort of protective sleeves on his shirt that I would love to have myself to keep chemicals off my arms. The whole process almost looked like some form of early scanning, sorta.
My wife was asking me "you actually recognize those things in their darkroom"? I almost hated to tell her that some of the stuff in my darkroom and two of my cameras are older than 1948. Boy, that will make you feel old. By the way, the guy that was imprisoned, whom Jimmy Stewart was trying to exonerate by means of that photo, was found.....sorry, you'll have to watch the film for that part.
Last edited by a moderator: